* A bug in scoring rules?
@ 2003-01-23 21:16 Karl Pflästerer
2003-01-24 21:54 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Karl Pflästerer @ 2003-01-23 21:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
Hi,
I read cllisp `(orphan -1000)' in the score file, so I can just use `I
S' in the summarybuffer for possibly interesting threads.
Now I habe an entry
("subject"
("(LISP Newbie)" nil 731238 s)
and *all* subjects match to that rule e.g.
-> Struggling with assignment
-> Analysis of different algorithms (rather OT)
-> Re: Performance and optimizations
.
.
.
What's happenig here? Are the parentheses a problem?
bye
KP
--
Männer der Wissenschaft! Man sagt ihr viele nach,
aber die meisten mit Unrecht.
Karl Kraus 'Aphorismen'
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread* Re: A bug in scoring rules?
2003-01-23 21:16 A bug in scoring rules? Karl Pflästerer
@ 2003-01-24 21:54 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen @ 2003-01-24 21:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
sigurd@12move.de (Karl Pflästerer) writes:
> ("subject"
> ("(LISP Newbie)" nil 731238 s)
[...]
> What's happenig here? Are the parentheses a problem?
Probably. What happens here depends on the value of your
`gnus-simplify-subject-functions' variable -- there's one function
that strips all words in parentheses, for instance.
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-01-24 21:54 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-01-23 21:16 A bug in scoring rules? Karl Pflästerer
2003-01-24 21:54 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).