From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/32361
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: prj@po.cwru.edu (Paul Jarc)
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Weird subject wrapping
Date: 08 Sep 2000 12:31:34 -0400
Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu
Message-ID: <m3zolisv43.fsf@multivac.student.cwru.edu>
References: <87u2brbyo4.fsf@senstation.vvf.fi> <vaf4s3rmcsv.fsf@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de> <m3bsxzt00o.fsf@multivac.student.cwru.edu> <vafaediq4ia.fsf@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de> <m33djaubto.fsf@multivac.student.cwru.edu> <vafog1yonoh.fsf@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035168643 19286 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 02:50:43 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 02:50:43 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu>
Original-Received: from fisher.math.uh.edu (fisher.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.35])
	by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49A3BD051E
	for <jason@mailhost.sclp.com>; Fri,  8 Sep 2000 12:32:51 -0400 (EDT)
Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5])
	by fisher.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAC07737;
	Fri, 8 Sep 2000 11:32:21 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Fri, 08 Sep 2000 11:31:43 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: from mailhost.sclp.com (postfix@66-209.196.61.interliant.com [209.196.61.66] (may be forged))
	by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA07651
	for <ding@hpc.uh.edu>; Fri, 8 Sep 2000 11:31:35 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: from multivac.student.cwru.edu (multivac.STUDENT.CWRU.Edu [129.22.239.69])
	by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 38697D051E
	for <ding@gnus.org>; Fri,  8 Sep 2000 12:32:01 -0400 (EDT)
Original-Received: (qmail 25124 invoked by uid 500); 8 Sep 2000 16:31:56 -0000
Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org
Original-To: ding@gnus.org
In-Reply-To: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE's message of "08 Sep 2000 18:26:06 +0200"
Original-Lines: 8
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.7
Precedence: list
X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:32361
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:32361

Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai =?iso-8859-1?q?Gro=DFjohann?=) writes:
> I was talking about the composition buffer.

Ah.  In that case, then, arbitrary transformations could be applied to
the message before sending - before it enters the domain of RFC822.


paul