From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/24385 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Paul Stevenson Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Removed forward slash? Date: 19 Jul 1999 10:04:35 -0400 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: <87wvvzgr93.fsf@pc-hrvoje.srce.hr> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035161961 8427 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 00:59:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 00:59:21 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from farabi.math.uh.edu (farabi.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.57]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA04461 for ; Mon, 19 Jul 1999 10:03:14 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by farabi.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id JAB06503; Mon, 19 Jul 1999 09:02:46 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Mon, 19 Jul 1999 09:03:39 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA20156 for ; Mon, 19 Jul 1999 09:03:30 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from q2ypc.phy.ornl.gov (paul@q2ypc.phy.ornl.gov [134.167.20.82]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA04432 for ; Mon, 19 Jul 1999 10:02:25 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: (from paul@localhost) by q2ypc.phy.ornl.gov (8.9.3/8.9.3) id KAA06751; Mon, 19 Jul 1999 10:04:36 -0400 Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: Kai =?iso-8859-1?q?Gro=DFjohann's?= message of "19 Jul 1999 12:53:44 +0200" Original-Lines: 21 User-Agent: Gnus/5.070093 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.93) Emacs/20.3 Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:24385 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:24385 Kai Großjohann writes: > Paul Stevenson writes: > > > [...] Only due to this discussion have I realised that not all > > 'italic' faces pick this up - gnus-emphasis-[bold-]italic does not > > change its colour. Ought I consider this a bug? > > I guess a similar line with bold-italic rather than italic will take > care of that. I'm not sure whether this is behavior should be changed. by the [bold-] notation I meant that both gnus-emphasis-italic and gnus-emphasis-bold-italic had the same behaviour (hmm, perhaps I ought really have used a regexp). I thought that at least gnus-emphasis-italic should pick up the Emacs.italic.* attributes. As you say, it's not quite so serious that bold-italic doesn't pick it up (although I'm not sure if one can specify a 'bolditalic' attribute - If not one might expect a font to pick up both bold and italic attributes seperately.)