From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/23156 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: IMAP + MIME + pGnus... Date: 12 Jun 1999 04:26:07 +0200 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: <86emlfpdff.fsf@kramer.bp.aventail.com> <86btgfl4p6.fsf@kramer.bp.aventail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035160941 508 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 00:42:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 00:42:21 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from farabi.math.uh.edu (farabi.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.57]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id WAA06214 for ; Fri, 11 Jun 1999 22:53:59 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by farabi.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id VAB06621; Fri, 11 Jun 1999 21:50:21 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Fri, 11 Jun 1999 21:50:38 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA05252 for ; Fri, 11 Jun 1999 21:49:14 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from quimbies.gnus.org (bang.netfonds.no [195.1.89.231]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id WAA05977 for ; Fri, 11 Jun 1999 22:48:12 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: (from larsi@localhost) by quimbies.gnus.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id EAA06781; Sat, 12 Jun 1999 04:48:46 +0200 Mail-Copies-To: never X-Now-Reading: Sheri S. Tepper's _The True Game_ X-Now-Playing: Basement Jaxx's _Remedy_: "Yo-Yo" Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: wmperry@aventail.com's message of "23 Apr 1999 10:47:01 -0500" User-Agent: Gnus/5.070086 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.86) Emacs/20.3 X-Face: &w!^oO~dS|}-P0~ge{$c!h\ Hmmm... I guess you could have Gnus internally know nothing about the > actual article other than the MIME handles. Instead of > XXX-request-article, you would have XXX-request-article-structure, and most > backends would just have a trivial wrapper of (mm-dissect-buffer > (XXX-request-article ...)) Hmm. Yes. Or the backend could just send the structure to Gnus on nn*-request-article, and all the contents could be message/external-body-ies. Or something. That would reduce a bit of the complexity, but, er, it still won't be trivial to implement... -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen