From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/21631 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Another (minor) issue with the new forwarding Date: 26 Feb 1999 23:47:57 +0100 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035159699 23933 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 00:21:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 00:21:39 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from fisher.math.uh.edu (fisher.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.35]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA21221 for ; Fri, 26 Feb 1999 17:52:17 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by fisher.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id QAB16481; Fri, 26 Feb 1999 16:51:00 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Fri, 26 Feb 1999 16:51:46 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id QAA14765 for ; Fri, 26 Feb 1999 16:50:58 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from quimbies.gnus.org (larsi@ppp079.uio.no [129.240.240.84]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA21108 for ; Fri, 26 Feb 1999 17:50:46 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: (from larsi@localhost) by quimbies.gnus.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id XAA28040; Fri, 26 Feb 1999 23:50:13 +0100 Mail-Copies-To: never X-Now-Reading: Italo Calvinos _Usynlige byer_ X-Now-Playing: Stereolab's _Dots and Loops_: "Prisoner of Mars" Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: dsg@mitre.org's message of "26 Feb 1999 16:31:27 -0500" User-Agent: Gnus/5.07008 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.80) XEmacs/21.2(beta3) (Aglaia) X-Face: &w!^oO~dS|}-P0~ge{$c!h\ I just forwarded a message with 0.79 and notice that my sig comes > after the inlined message. This caused some confusion on the part of > the recipient (a netscape user, if it matters) who thought that the > forwarded message was authored by me due to the sig placement and the > lack of delimiter at the end of the inlined message (it didn't help > that the forwarded message had no sig itself). There is a "--=-=-=" delimiter between the parts, isn't there? Anyway, wasn't the Netscape user presented with the message/rfc822 part as an attachment? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen