Re: Gnus interface to Bugzilla?

[Steve Youngs <steve@sxemacs.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1413 bytes --]

* Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> writes:

  > Steve Youngs <steve@sxemacs.org> writes:
  >> No, that'd suck.  Each bug should be a thread within the group that is
  >> the "product".  We have 2 "products" in our Bugzilla, so you'd have
  >> something like...

  > Hm...  the problem then would be things like "I want to see all the
  > messages in bug #542, but not any others in the same product
  > category".  With the one-group-per-bug approach, that would be `C-u
  > RET', while with the one-group-per-product, it would require a
  > separate special command.

`/ s' solves that for one-group-per-product.

  > And if you're not interested in a bug, you just kill the group.
  > Etc.

one-group-per-product would just use scoring here.

  > Of course, it helps if you use topics and all the new bugzilla groups
  > end up there automatically.

Also helps if you hook the find-new-groups func into something so
these thousands of new groups appear automatically.

BTW, suppose I was a Mozilla developer... your one-group-per-bug means
I could have anywhere up to 300000 groups in my Gnus!!  That's just
insane.


-- 
|---<Steve Youngs>---------------<GnuPG KeyID: A94B3003>---|
|                 I am Dyslexic of Borg.                   | 
|    Fusistance is retile. Your arse will be laminated.    |
|------------------------------------<steve@sxemacs.org>---|

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 256 bytes --]