From: Steve Youngs <sryoungs@bigpond.net.au>
Cc: Jerry James <james@xemacs.org>,
bugs@gnus.org, ding@gnus.org, xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: gnus-util.el loads rmail
Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2003 11:25:18 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <microsoft-free.87wu9cawe9.fsf@eicq.dnsalias.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b9yu14g2itr.fsf@jpl.org> (Katsumi Yamaoka's message of "Fri, 05 Dec 2003 09:45:36 +0900")
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1529 bytes --]
|--==> "KY" == Katsumi Yamaoka <yamaoka@jpl.org> writes:
KY> Loading of rmail is only for the `rmail-select-summary' macro,
KY> isn't it? If so, it can be solved by not compiling that section:
KY> --- gnus-util.el~ 2003-12-03 23:28:53 +0000
KY> +++ gnus-util.el 2003-12-05 00:44:47 +0000
KY> @@ -864,8 +864,9 @@
KY> (narrow-to-region (point) (point-max))
KY> (rmail-count-new-messages t)
KY> (when (rmail-summary-exists)
KY> - (rmail-select-summary
KY> - (rmail-update-summary)))
KY> + (dont-compile
KY> + (rmail-select-summary
KY> + (rmail-update-summary))))
KY> (rmail-count-new-messages t)
KY> (rmail-show-message msg))
KY> (save-buffer)))))
KY> How about it?
So this would be as a replacement to Jerry's patch or in addition to
it?
And the doc string from `dont-compile' troubles me a little...
,----[ C-h f dont-compile RET ]
| `dont-compile' is a compiled Lisp macro
| -- loaded from "/usr/local/lib/xemacs-21.4.14/lisp/bytecomp-runtime.elc"
| (dont-compile &rest BODY)
|
| Documentation:
| Like `progn', but the body always runs interpreted (not compiled).
| If you think you need this, you're probably making a mistake somewhere.
`----
...that last line in particular.
--
|---<Steve Youngs>---------------<GnuPG KeyID: A94B3003>---|
| Ashes to ashes, dust to dust. |
| The proof of the pudding, is under the crust. |
|------------------------------<sryoungs@bigpond.net.au>---|
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 256 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-12-05 1:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-12-05 0:45 Katsumi Yamaoka
2003-12-05 1:25 ` Steve Youngs [this message]
2003-12-05 2:52 ` Katsumi Yamaoka
2003-12-07 20:25 ` Steve Youngs
2003-12-08 2:35 ` Katsumi Yamaoka
2003-12-08 4:15 ` Steve Youngs
2003-12-08 9:01 ` Katsumi Yamaoka
2003-12-08 20:05 ` Steve Youngs
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=microsoft-free.87wu9cawe9.fsf@eicq.dnsalias.org \
--to=sryoungs@bigpond.net.au \
--cc=bugs@gnus.org \
--cc=ding@gnus.org \
--cc=james@xemacs.org \
--cc=xemacs-beta@xemacs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).