From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/38849 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Steve Youngs Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: I hate the new indentation in message-mode Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 08:51:37 +1000 Organization: The XEmacs Development Team Sender: steve@dingoblue.net.au Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035174649 24723 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 04:30:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 04:30:49 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 21974 invoked from network); 19 Sep 2001 22:57:00 -0000 Original-Received: from mail013.syd.optusnet.com.au (203.2.75.174) by gnus.org with SMTP; 19 Sep 2001 22:57:00 -0000 Original-Received: from slackware.mynet.pc (wdcax13-011.dialup.optusnet.com.au [198.142.220.11]) by mail013.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f8JMudg31007 for ; Thu, 20 Sep 2001 08:56:40 +1000 Original-Received: (from steve@localhost) by slackware.mynet.pc (8.12.0.Beta7/8.12.0.Beta7) id f8JMpb65026479; Thu, 20 Sep 2001 08:51:37 +1000 Mail-Copies-To: never Original-To: Gnus List X-Attribution: SY X-URL: X-Face: %@A&y\ef)A6pi|q43;M>uyhO)~NP*fpdo0XrUuutf0|nku\O5JV(7EG%odc'n6}G@tYRl+B #[n,%B`.sHZ5>3MZvrm%,rWE7)c}ZXjH\>=p@AL\y\gyu|.lJ8B`F++86 In-Reply-To: (Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE's message of "Wed, 19 Sep 2001 14:04:57 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) XEmacs/21.5 (asparagus) Original-Lines: 18 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:38849 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:38849 |--=3D=3D> "KG" =3D=3D Kai Gro=DFjohann writes: KG> Steve Youngs writes: >>Personally, I use M-TAB completion in the To|Cc etc headers (from >>BBDB). So, for me at least, rebinding TAB wouldn't cause me any >>suffering.=20 KG> But TAB can do completion in Newsgroups headers, too. And more KG> headers if you add the entry in message-completion-alist. Would it be possible to have the completion in the headers and revert to normal TAB behaviour outside of the headers? --=20 |---------------------| | XEmacs - It's not just an editor. | | It's a way of life. | |---------------------------------------|