From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/38822 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Steve Youngs Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: I hate the new indentation in message-mode Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 07:27:47 +1000 Organization: The XEmacs Development Team Sender: steve@dingoblue.net.au Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035174626 24588 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 04:30:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 04:30:26 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 19545 invoked from network); 18 Sep 2001 22:36:16 -0000 Original-Received: from mail018.syd.optusnet.com.au (203.2.75.177) by gnus.org with SMTP; 18 Sep 2001 22:36:16 -0000 Original-Received: from slackware.mynet.pc (wdcax13-057.dialup.optusnet.com.au [198.142.220.57]) by mail018.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f8IMZud27964 for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2001 08:35:57 +1000 Original-Received: (from steve@localhost) by slackware.mynet.pc (8.12.0.Beta7/8.12.0.Beta7) id f8ILRl01022159; Wed, 19 Sep 2001 07:27:47 +1000 Mail-Copies-To: never Original-To: Gnus List X-Attribution: SY X-URL: X-Face: %@A&y\ef)A6pi|q43;M>uyhO)~NP*fpdo0XrUuutf0|nku\O5JV(7EG%odc'n6}G@tYRl+B #[n,%B`.sHZ5>3MZvrm%,rWE7)c}ZXjH\>=p@AL\y\gyu|.lJ8B`F++86 In-Reply-To: (Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE's message of "Tue, 18 Sep 2001 19:49:52 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) XEmacs/21.5 (asparagus) Original-Lines: 30 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:38822 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:38822 |--=3D=3D> "KG" =3D=3D Kai Gro=DFjohann writes: KG> Didier Verna writes: >>In the good ol'days, I used to start all my paragraphs with a >>simple TAB, including paragraphs answering to quotations. Now, >>here's what it gives me. This is stupid. I hate that. KG> Hm. I thought that indent-relative was the best thing since sliced KG> bread... The bread's gone moldy. KG> Anyway, M-i should do what you want. If you don't use the completion KG> functionality of message-tab, you can also just rebind the TAB key. KG> If you do use the completion functionality, you could modify the KG> source. Personally, I use M-TAB completion in the To|Cc etc headers (from BBDB). So, for me at least, rebinding TAB wouldn't cause me any suffering.=20 But really, when you are in the middle of editing some text, a TAB should be a TAB. Not some other fancy thing. And most people expect their TABs to be consistent. --=20 |---------------------| | XEmacs - It's not just an editor. | | It's a way of life. | |---------------------------------------|