From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/33361 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Steve Youngs Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: followup in nnimap groups doesn't heed Mail-Copies-To Date: 16 Nov 2000 03:19:44 +1000 Organization: Linux Users - Fanatics Dept. Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035169483 24715 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 03:04:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 03:04:43 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from spinoza.math.uh.edu (spinoza.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.18]) by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09E1CD049A for ; Wed, 15 Nov 2000 12:27:30 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by spinoza.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAB09405; Wed, 15 Nov 2000 11:27:13 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Wed, 15 Nov 2000 11:26:36 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from mailhost.sclp.com (postfix@66-209.196.61.interliant.com [209.196.61.66] (may be forged)) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA05991 for ; Wed, 15 Nov 2000 11:26:22 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from users.ozlinx.com.au (users.ozlinx.com.au [203.46.58.2]) by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B239D049A for ; Wed, 15 Nov 2000 12:26:44 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from slackware.mynet.pc (root@dialup-221.pdx.ozlinx.com.au [202.61.190.106]) by users.ozlinx.com.au (8.10.0/8.10.0) with ESMTP id eAFHQbS32500 for ; Thu, 16 Nov 2000 03:26:37 +1000 Original-Received: (from steve@localhost) by slackware.mynet.pc (8.11.1/8.11.1) id eAFHJiX17379; Thu, 16 Nov 2000 03:19:44 +1000 Mail-Copies-To: nobody Original-To: ding list X-Attribution: SY X-Face: 6S=xefppom_(T7E_7`ueb%MkjsPn69FhpX<2K||I*W{TEd~0A7UQe`9yxQJQ+3\"Gp{+-Mj L2/ZZ5B*7MgOw.)kZ2vw5Up:c^!7R1g(gyB0'{=;SY`Q=4'4i>)*A7ZIixd(iUcrXTaL9LA2ITx6fk IwS/E@?HU% X-Yow: Now, let's SEND OUT for QUICHE!! In-Reply-To: Original-Lines: 16 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.2 (Pan) Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:33361 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:33361 * "Kai" =3D=3D Kai Gro=DFjohann writes: Kai> Looking closer, I see that you have MCT nobody whereas I have MCT Kai> never. Okay, I'll switch to nobody now. I remember a discussion a while back on gnu.emacs.gnus about which was correct; MCT nobody or MCT never. MCT nobody won. I'm pretty sure that Gnus used to honor both, doesn't it still do that? If not, perhaps it should. --=20 |--------------[GnuPG KeyID: EFD82ED2]---| | It's a funny thing about life; if you refuse to accept | | anything but the best, you very often get it | |--------------------------------|