From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/9423 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Paul Stodghill Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: PGP verifying NoCeM messages Date: 15 Jan 1997 09:48:51 -0500 Sender: stodghil@CS.Cornell.EDU Message-ID: References: <27442.852916583@splat.niehs.nih.gov> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.100) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035149452 18365 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:30:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:30:52 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP id HAA22856 for ; Wed, 15 Jan 1997 07:07:47 -0800 Original-Received: from simon.cs.cornell.edu (SIMON.CS.CORNELL.EDU [128.84.154.10]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Wed, 15 Jan 1997 15:48:58 +0100 Original-Received: from cloyd.cs.cornell.edu (CLOYD.CS.CORNELL.EDU [128.84.227.15]) by simon.cs.cornell.edu (8.8.4/8.8.4/R-1.7) with ESMTP id JAA24021 for ; Wed, 15 Jan 1997 09:48:56 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from hoho.cs.cornell.edu (HOHO.CS.CORNELL.EDU [128.84.211.72]) by cloyd.cs.cornell.edu (8.8.4/8.8.4/M-1.8) with ESMTP id JAA00238 for ; Wed, 15 Jan 1997 09:48:54 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: (from stodghil@localhost) by hoho.cs.cornell.edu (8.8.4/8.8.4/C-1.2) id JAA21604; Wed, 15 Jan 1997 09:48:51 -0500 (EST) Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no In-Reply-To: David Moore's message of 14 Jan 1997 21:29:53 -0800 Original-Lines: 12 X-Mailer: Red Gnus v0.80/XEmacs 19.14 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:9423 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:9423 >>>>> "David" == David Moore writes: David> I ended up turning of the pgp verifying, but couldn't you David> put their keys in your local ring and solve the key server David> problems? Yes, this is exactly what I have done. Works just fine: NoCeM verification is acceptable fast and doesn't fail. -- Paul Stodghill http://www.cs.cornell.edu/home/stodghil/home.html