From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/38309
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Gunnar Evermann <ge204@eng.cam.ac.uk>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: groups.google.com provides original articles
Date: 26 Aug 2001 10:54:34 +0100
Message-ID: <mqq1ylzuox1.fsf@eng.cam.ac.uk>
References: <mqq66bctfm2.fsf@eng.cam.ac.uk> <2n8zg8xgab.fsf@piglet.jia.vnet>
	<mqqg0agrs26.fsf@eng.cam.ac.uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035174194 21686 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 04:23:14 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 04:23:14 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <ge204@eng.cam.ac.uk>
Return-Path: <ge204@eng.cam.ac.uk>
Original-Received: (qmail 17699 invoked from network); 26 Aug 2001 09:54:40 -0000
Original-Received: from spanner.eng.cam.ac.uk (?root?@129.169.8.9)
  by gnus.org with SMTP; 26 Aug 2001 09:54:40 -0000
Original-Received: from tigger.eng.cam.ac.uk
          (via root@tigger.eng.cam.ac.uk [129.169.80.71])
          by spanner.eng.cam.ac.uk with ESMTP id KAA10985
          for <ding@gnus.org>; Sun, 26 Aug 2001 10:54:37 +0100 (BST)
Original-Received: from tweed.eng.cam.ac.uk
          (via IDENT:mailuser@tweed [129.169.82.143])
          by tigger.eng.cam.ac.uk with ESMTP id KAA27110
          for <ding@gnus.org>; Sun, 26 Aug 2001 10:54:35 +0100 (BST)
Original-Received: (via ge204@localhost)
          by tweed.eng.cam.ac.uk id KAA18559;
          Sun, 26 Aug 2001 10:54:34 +0100 (BST)
Original-To: ding@gnus.org
In-Reply-To: <mqqg0agrs26.fsf@eng.cam.ac.uk>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.1 (Canyonlands)
Original-Lines: 16
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:38309
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:38309

Gunnar Evermann <ge204@eng.cam.ac.uk> writes:

[ nnweb using groups.google ] 

> Thanks, very nice, but something seems to go wrong in some cases. Here
> is what I did:

I had a quick look at this and the problem is with groups that do not
exist anymore. For these Google doesn't make the groupname a link and
the code in  nnweb-google-parse-1 fails to parse the info from the
green line and retains the info from the previous article (which is
rather dangerous, as it covers up bugs).

I'll leave fixing this to somebody who actually understands nnweb.

  Gunnar