From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/65860 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: nathanw@MIT.EDU (Nathan J. Williams) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: problem in connecting to Exchange 2007 - possible solution? Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2007 13:14:57 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87bq97psi4.fsf@mocca.josefsson.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1196705774 4100 80.91.229.12 (3 Dec 2007 18:16:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2007 18:16:14 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M14355@lists.math.uh.edu Mon Dec 03 19:16:22 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IzFq2-0006zD-6h for ding-account@gmane.org; Mon, 03 Dec 2007 19:16:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1IzFpT-0000E8-Fh; Mon, 03 Dec 2007 12:15:39 -0600 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1IzFpS-0000Dr-Ch for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 03 Dec 2007 12:15:38 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1IzFpK-00066V-U9 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 03 Dec 2007 12:15:38 -0600 Original-Received: from biscayne-one-station.mit.edu ([18.7.7.80]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1IzFpH-0006Ve-00 for ; Mon, 03 Dec 2007 19:15:27 +0100 Original-Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (OUTGOING-AUTH.MIT.EDU [18.7.22.103]) by biscayne-one-station.mit.edu (8.13.6/8.9.2) with ESMTP id lB3IEwjn018713 for ; Mon, 3 Dec 2007 13:14:58 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from contents-vnder-pressvre.mit.edu (CONTENTS-VNDER-PRESSVRE.MIT.EDU [18.7.18.65]) (authenticated bits=56) (User authenticated as nathanw@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.13.6/8.12.4) with ESMTP id lB3IEvjm004346 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 3 Dec 2007 13:14:58 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: (from nathanw@localhost) by contents-vnder-pressvre.mit.edu (8.12.9.20060308) id lB3IEv5J021224; Mon, 3 Dec 2007 13:14:57 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <87bq97psi4.fsf@mocca.josefsson.org> (Simon Josefsson's message of "Mon\, 03 Dec 2007 19\:01\:23 +0100") X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.42 X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.00 X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:65860 Archived-At: Simon Josefsson writes: > We shouldn't apply this so it is enabled by everyone, because it wastes > bandwidth (sometimes by a large factor, bandwidth goes from O(1) to O(n) > where n is the size of the mailbox...). Maybe you could rewrite this so > that it is only used if some variable is enabled? Does it? "FETCH *:*" seems to only return one message, the last one, which makes sense to me - it's the range of messages from last to last. It's not a synonym for "1:*". - Nathan