Re: The type of gnus-ignored-from-addresses

[Didier Verna <didier@xemacs.org>]

Katsumi Yamaoka <yamaoka@jpl.org> wrote:

>>         But gnus-util is a special case because it doesn't 'require
>> any other part of Gnus[1]; it's really a utility library.
>
> I don't think so.
>
> ;;; gmm-utils.el --- Utility functions for Gnus, Message and MML
> ;;; gnus-util.el --- utility functions for Gnus
> ;;; mm-util.el --- Utility functions for Mule and low level things

        Again, you're not very clear. OK, so there are 3 special cases. 
Are you suggesting that gnus-orify-regexp would be better placed in
gmm-utils (since both Message and Gnus could use it) ?


>>         Sorry, I don't understand this paragraph. Are you suggesting
>> that I put an autoload cookie on gnus-orify-regexp instead of
>> requiring gnus-util ? That would only merely delay the time of
>> loading gnus-util.
>
> No.  I'd suggest replacing `(require 'gnus-util)' with:
>
> (eval-and-compile
>   (autoload 'gnus-orify-regexp "gnus-util")
>   )
>
> The most suitable place to put it seems to be around the 1777th
> line in message.el.  You will see a lot of autoloads there.

        I agree, but see above though.

-- 
Read the Jazz Blog !! http://jazzblog.didierverna.com

Didier Verna, didier@lrde.epita.fr, http://www.lrde.epita.fr/~didier

EPITA / LRDE, 14-16 rue Voltaire   Tel.+33 (1) 44 08 01 85
94276 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France   Fax.+33 (1) 53 14 59 22   didier@xemacs.org