From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/37607 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Didier Verna Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: message-tab is broken Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2001 17:42:31 +0200 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035172990 14713 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 04:03:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 04:03:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Gnus Beta Testers Return-Path: Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 2229 invoked from network); 8 Aug 2001 15:39:43 -0000 Original-Received: from hermes.epita.fr (163.5.255.10) by gnus.org with SMTP; 8 Aug 2001 15:39:43 -0000 Original-Received: from goa.lrde.epita.fr (mail@goa.lrde.epita.fr [10.223.13.2]) by hermes.epita.fr id f78Hc6t08254 Wed, 8 Aug 2001 17:38:06 GMT Original-Received: from uzeb.lrde.epita.fr ([10.223.13.53] ident=mail) by goa.lrde.epita.fr with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 15UVUb-0005Hq-00; Wed, 08 Aug 2001 17:43:33 +0200 Original-Received: from didier by uzeb.lrde.epita.fr with local (Exim 3.31 #1 (Debian)) id 15UVTb-0007gA-00; Wed, 08 Aug 2001 17:42:31 +0200 Original-To: Kai.Grossjohann@cs.uni-dortmund.de (Kai =?iso-8859-1?q?Gro=DFjohann?=) X-Attribution: drv X-Url: http://www.lrde.epita.fr/~didier X-Web: http://www.lrde.epita.fr/~didier X-Home-Page: http://www.lrde.epita.fr/~didier In-Reply-To: (Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE's message of "Wed, 08 Aug 2001 16:20:16 +0200") X-Face: |j}\)O|k##MrRz#VK$Jy=0r=3Qc,,a/Tr6*JQbE73dy17]2YcmW$9Z&H21e}#~#pgc>dn(is5Bv1l!{1re+Q9suKIOUmOqZs2>QMxHlR;;}kaGYA@HR3D C6 X-Face: 6o|eiKqaHN.ANh8HXDzntcWUOCg\]RsOd.ctvm~*y}Y^R&*a+Co,\s#=HWsw3x$b_n2kJ#g (7u?J^@^xP)f,jUF|0Z'J:|G/bMA5O12*b,7`-Q`=pKsCRIpso07.Y>YB2H{7`?u&yh;C_ZtLHfj Didier Verna writes: > >> The problem with the `relative' family is that if the previous non >> blank line is not indented, you wouldn't get the tab. Maybe >> `indent-for-tab-command' would be the best choice ? > > Whatever. My point was, rather than calling a different function, > change the value of indent-line-function. Do you agree? Huh, why not, but that sounds over complicated to me. message-tab already handles its special cases (in headers). Why does it need to do comp= lex stuff just to get tabs otherwise ? --=20 Didier Verna, didier@lrde.epita.fr, http://www.lrde.epita.fr/~didier EPITA / LRDE, 14-16 rue Voltaire Tel.+33 (1) 53 14 59 47 94276 Le Kremlin-Bic=EAtre, France Fax.+33 (1) 44 08 01 99 didier@xemac= s.org