From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/76244 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Riley Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Imap split, does not work (of course) Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 12:25:36 +0100 Organization: aich tea tea pea dicky riley dot net Message-ID: References: <87r5bsleui.fsf@gnus.org> <87bp2uap6c.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1296645971 7887 80.91.229.12 (2 Feb 2011 11:26:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 11:26:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org To: Eric S Fraga Original-X-From: ding-owner+M24596@lists.math.uh.edu Wed Feb 02 12:26:07 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pkaqc-0000S4-CR for ding-account@gmane.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 12:26:06 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PkaqY-0004VN-FW; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 05:26:02 -0600 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PkaqX-0004VB-9B for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 05:26:01 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PkaqW-0002Xs-3n for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 05:26:01 -0600 Original-Received: from mail-bw0-f44.google.com ([209.85.214.44]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PkaqV-00018R-9U for ding@gnus.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 12:25:59 +0100 Original-Received: by bwz12 with SMTP id 12so413556bwz.17 for ; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 03:25:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date :organization:message-id:references:user-agent:mime-version :content-type; bh=36qZVcGGmYfyibmYCl/kZdJjkU9+86AtYKP1ZDVruBo=; b=Tf2wA7iUaGhLfzbmuW/ngrWn/xwnQ0HYfNj0cxfl/D6nIX8/hqMpZWYmni2CX6a1Hz NfaQhEyw0GaTEfvTvpQ0U77KzbbNOFNzX6KipeSAjzUFvzGvrMZTITZ7xwOWOrXJj57M 0x+Vo7afrbRMUvtiFuMjb+NtnjvxLQPbUXJic= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date:organization:message-id :references:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; b=eany/t8FfrGjKUW+13eybL1Hc4h9vR73v7IqJjpANsBrWIFdX7uWFewXLqMtciIKDQ litBKEyGzhVmqwU9vKcwmhZsRe6sXPCBcvakqXY7MVOArUqIDrz8dunZoornedLB6xPt U06E+rGI27CAziGFrCW2AWqz567LMQUWP+TWg= Original-Received: by 10.204.70.136 with SMTP id d8mr7992984bkj.96.1296645952923; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 03:25:52 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from localhost ([85.183.18.158]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b6sm11580535bkb.10.2011.02.02.03.25.50 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 02 Feb 2011 03:25:51 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87bp2uap6c.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> (Eric S. Fraga's message of "Wed, 02 Feb 2011 07:08:59 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Spam-Score: -1.1 (-) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:76244 Archived-At: Eric S Fraga writes: > Francis Moreau writes: > > [...] > >>> (nnimap-split-methods >>> (("INBOX.toto" "^From:.*francis.moro@gmail.com"))) > > [...] > >> Could anybody point out some way to debug this ? >> >> Any traces to activate to show some revelant stuff ? >> >> Thanks > > I cannot help you wrt debugging; I can however show you my (abridged) > configuration which is based on fancy splitting. I never did get > "not-so-fancy" splitting to work, so I can understand your frustration. > > All split related variables in my configuration are here: > > > > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > (setq > nnmail-split-fancy > '(| (to ".*somelist@somehost.org" "lists") > (from ".*someuser@some.other.host" "people") > "general" > ) > nnimap-split-methods 'default > nnmail-split-methods 'nnmail-split-fancy > ) > --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- > > > If someone could explain the concept of "backend slots" vs using "setq" it would help me a lot. I have been unable to see when something should be set with setq and when things are passed as a parameter to secondary-methods call.