From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/26046 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Oscar Figueiredo Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Signature/encryption, what's the standard ? Date: 27 Oct 1999 14:57:29 +0200 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.108) Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="pgp-sign-Multipart_Wed_Oct_27_14:56:48_1999-1"; micalg=pgp-md5 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035163328 17362 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 01:22:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 01:22:08 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from bart.math.uh.edu (bart.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.48]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id IAA13846 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 1999 08:59:59 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by bart.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id HAB17398; Wed, 27 Oct 1999 07:59:48 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Wed, 27 Oct 1999 07:58:18 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA15059 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 1999 07:58:06 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from lspsun12.epfl.ch (root@lspsun12.epfl.ch [128.178.75.34]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id IAA13834 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 1999 08:57:33 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from lspsun17.epfl.ch (figueire@lspsun17.epfl.ch [128.178.75.85]) by lspsun12.epfl.ch (8.8.X/EPFL-8.1a) with ESMTP id OAA04185 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 1999 14:57:30 +0200 (MET DST) Original-Received: (from figueire@localhost) by lspsun17.epfl.ch (8.8.X/EPFL-8.1a) id OAA19154; Wed, 27 Oct 1999 14:57:30 +0200 (MET DST) Original-To: ding@gnus.org X-Attribution: Oscar X-Face: &f0TVPZirOQ$"C[5pZkDY(1~+M1p0&edTtJPL-*?u$b(vr<1m?~iZBqp2YoDS[IyxDHVU~)KHl|Kpm"='5OF?vT]k_HQ1]|^}Pm>,;+]iJCt_-Y[S\ EpwT);2R8#[4dt8~*}$6xI4jNZM9lVHua'vIM[PEx*#cgxCVruf1zN0} Original-Lines: 32 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.6.45/XEmacs 21.1 - "Arches" Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:26046 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:26046 --pgp-sign-Multipart_Wed_Oct_27_14:56:48_1999-1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII I would like to know what's the preferred way of signing messages nowadays: PGP or S/MIME (i.e. RFC 2015 or 2646) ? I'm asking because I just had an argument with a M*crosoft Outlook user who claimed the body of my messages appear as attachments instead of inline and I should therefore use S/MIME instead of PGP signatures because it was the preferred way to sign a message. Not that I agree with him since both signature types are standards track RFCs, but does pGnus have some support for PGP or S/MIME of any kind (I haven't been using pGnus for a long time) ? Oscar --pgp-sign-Multipart_Wed_Oct_27_14:56:48_1999-1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE----- Version: 2.6.3i Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.4, an Emacs/PGP interface iQBVAwUBOBb2lp7CaiYEgqPZAQFSvgH9HpOMmHYpxXqtM+poBZksu2s6xe0q6WlJ ALEmYOUms0abcD+c61BZ6CGzE5yrCuyDLJqdTp1JmCtScWRY9ii2hw== =BoeB -----END PGP MESSAGE----- --pgp-sign-Multipart_Wed_Oct_27_14:56:48_1999-1--