From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/5458 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: craffert@ml.com (Colin Rafferty) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: get new mail only Date: 05 Mar 1996 10:46:34 -0500 Sender: craffert@spssunp.sps.ml.com Message-ID: References: <26211.826038810@blackbird.mitre.org> Reply-To: Colin Rafferty NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035146059 399 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 20:34:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:34:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: (ding) GNUS Mailing List Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.7.3/8.6.9) with SMTP id IAA30358 for ; Tue, 5 Mar 1996 08:40:16 -0800 Original-Received: from mlfire.ml.com (mlfire.ml.com [192.246.100.1]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Tue, 5 Mar 1996 16:49:40 +0100 Original-Received: from commpost.ml.com ([146.125.4.24]) by mlfire.ml.com (8.7.4/8.7.3/MLgw-2.03) with SMTP id KAA24933; Tue, 5 Mar 1996 10:50:49 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from sparc10.sps.ml.com ([192.168.111.24]) by commpost.ml.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id KAA04041; Tue, 5 Mar 1996 10:50:24 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from spssunp.masdev.ml.com by sparc10.sps.ml.com (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA25911; Tue, 5 Mar 96 10:46:49 EST Original-Received: by spssunp.masdev.ml.com (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA12767; Tue, 5 Mar 96 10:46:35 EST Original-To: Dave Goldberg In-Reply-To: Dave Goldberg's message of Tue, 05 Mar 1996 10:13:30 -0500 Original-Lines: 25 X-Face: ""xJff%{>hr-{:QXl"Xk2O@@(+F]e{"%EYQiW@mUuvEsL>=mx96j12qW[%m;|:B^n{J8k?Mz[K1_+H;$v,nYx^1o_=4M,L+]FIU~[[`-w~~xsy-BX,?tAF_.8u&0y*@aCv;a}Y'{w@#*@iwAl?oZpvvv X-Y-Zippy: Yow! I threw up on my window! Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:5458 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:5458 Dave Goldberg writes: > Colin Rafferty writes: >> I have umpteen little mail groups. I find that gnus-group-get-new-news >> is very slow when I `2 g' to just get my mail. I realized that it is >> because it is looking at all my level 2 groups. > I'm not sure I understand. Do all your nnml groups have the > possibility of getting new mail? If not, why not just make the few > that might receive new mail level 1? 1 g is alot faster than 2 g and > is probably equivalent to any other function you might write to check > if there is mail for that particular group. I have a little more than fifty different mail groups in my nnmail-split-methods, most of which regularly receive mail. I very seldom (if ever) need to move a message into a different group. I always thought that most people split their mail pretty heavily. That is the main reason I moved from GNUS/VM to just Gnus. Thanks for the advice, though. -- Colin