From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/5951 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: craffert@ml.com (Colin Rafferty) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: pb sg .73 gnus-xmas-find-glyph-dir XEmacs Date: 16 Apr 1996 11:45:00 -0400 Sender: craffert@spspme.ml.com Message-ID: References: <199604150919.LAA01262@irsun29.ifp.fr> <199604161010.MAA03065@irsun29.ifp.fr> Reply-To: Colin Rafferty NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035146479 1891 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 20:41:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:41:19 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id JAA02503 for ; Tue, 16 Apr 1996 09:32:52 -0700 Original-Received: from mlfire.ml.com (mlfire.ml.com [192.246.100.1]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Tue, 16 Apr 1996 17:45:37 +0200 Original-Received: from commpost.ml.com ([146.125.4.24]) by mlfire.ml.com (8.7.5/8.7.3/MLgw-2.05) with SMTP id LAA28624 for ; Tue, 16 Apr 1996 11:48:15 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from spssunp.spspme.ml.com ([192.168.111.13]) by commpost.ml.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA11131 for ; Tue, 16 Apr 1996 11:47:32 -0400 (EST) Original-Received: by spssunp.spspme.ml.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-4.1) id LAA12692; Tue, 16 Apr 1996 11:45:02 -0400 Original-To: (ding) GNUS Mailing List In-Reply-To: Nathanael.MAKAREVITCH@ifp.fr's message of Tue, 16 Apr 1996 12:10:20 +0200 Original-Lines: 23 X-Face: D>:hrrB{l6#\wU;)0R:OHSTA@ayd.Oq?s@Rrc;[+z0m+<-U"$G-J6L)F2QY`qK~uPu!s1(6{\#uy!Ag/D)?'L[}xErXvxoPn8T_hKi{M]/(`BF{e}X7;hby`p\.E$rJ}Aff#BT,rdDIw\y X-Y-Zippy: Am I in GRADUATE SCHOOL yet? Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:5951 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:5951 Nathanael Makarevitch writes: > this mailing-list does not send mails with a Reply-To" pointing to > itself. is it deliberate, in order to keep the amount of traffic low by > inviting participants to use private email ? Certainly not. I assume that most readers are like me and have a separate newgroup for ding@ifi, and have the following property on the list: (to-address . "(ding) GNUS Mailing List ") Then, why following-up `F' or `f', you automatically get the mailing list. (ding) rules. -- Colin Rafferty Violate the Communications Decency Act. "Thou shalt betroth a wife, and another man shall lie with her." (Punishment for anyone who violates the commandments, Deuteronomy 28:30)