From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/9150 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Colin Rafferty Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: feature request Date: 09 Dec 1996 15:58:09 -0500 Message-ID: References: Reply-To: Colin Rafferty NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035149219 16742 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:26:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:26:59 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP id NAA15227 for ; Mon, 9 Dec 1996 13:11:45 -0800 Original-Received: from mlfire.ml.com (mlfire.ml.com [192.246.100.1]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Mon, 9 Dec 1996 21:58:13 +0100 Original-Received: from commpost.ml.com ([146.125.4.24]) by mlfire.ml.com (8.7.5/8.7.3/MLgw-2.07) with SMTP id QAA18678 for ; Mon, 9 Dec 1996 16:01:28 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from spssunp.spspme.ml.com (spssunp.spspme.ml.com [192.168.111.13]) by commpost.ml.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id PAA06484; Mon, 9 Dec 1996 15:59:49 -0500 Original-Received: by spssunp.spspme.ml.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-4.1) id PAA07986; Mon, 9 Dec 1996 15:58:10 -0500 Original-To: (ding) GNUS Mailing List X-Face: ""xJff%{>hr-{:QXl"Xk2O@@(+F]e{"%EYQiW@mUuvEsL>=mx96j12qW[%m;|:B^n{J8k?Mz[K1_+H;$v,nYx^1o_=4M,L+]FIU~[[`-w~~xsy-BX,?tAF_.8u&0y*@aCv;a}Y'{w@#*@iwAl?oZpvvv X-Y-Zippy: Hold the MAYO & pass the COSMIC AWARENESS... In-Reply-To: David Moore's message of 09 Dec 1996 12:01:22 -0800 Original-Lines: 27 X-Mailer: Red Gnus v0.60/XEmacs 19.14 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:9150 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:9150 David Moore writes: > Colin Rafferty writes: >> 2. This could be disastrous `gnus-summary-exit-no-update'. At least, it >> would be a little difficult. It would mean that gnus would have to >> remember what the original info of the group was, and append that to >> the dribble on `Q'. > What do you do if gnus crashes just before you are about to hit > 'Q'? Or is this information only being used to regenerate the same > summary buffer the next time you start (rather than actually updating > the group info)? I would say that you lose. I guess that there would need to be another interactive function called `gnus-summary-forget-update-info' that you could call if, after having called `gnus-summary-update-info' some number of times, you realize that you haven't been paying attention, and you want to start over reading from scratch (without having to `Q' and re-enter the group). I am sorry about that last sentence, but I had two large Diet Cokes with lunch. -- Colin Rafferty ``You Unix-heads are all about to be crushed under the heel of the Windows juggernaut'' -- jwz