From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/9149
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Colin Rafferty <craffert@spspme.ml.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: feature request
Date: 09 Dec 1996 15:50:26 -0500
Message-ID: <ocrrakzmoh9.fsf@spssunp.spspme.ml.com>
References: <ri7pw0ke4v4.fsf@rs5.tcs.tulane.edu> <m2ybf7d0tx.fsf@altair.xemacs.org> <ocrybf7ms6z.fsf@spssunp.spspme.ml.com> <ocrwwurmrpi.fsf@spssunp.spspme.ml.com>
Reply-To: Colin Rafferty <craffert@ml.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035149218 16741 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:26:58 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:26:58 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <ding-request@ifi.uio.no>
Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2])
          by deanna.miranova.com (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP
	  id NAA15199 for <steve@miranova.com>; Mon, 9 Dec 1996 13:07:07 -0800
Original-Received: from mlfire.ml.com (mlfire.ml.com [192.246.100.1]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) 
	id <VAA09872@ifi.uio.no> for <ding@ifi.uio.no> ; Mon, 9 Dec 1996 21:50:30 +0100
Original-Received: from commpost.ml.com ([146.125.4.24]) by mlfire.ml.com (8.7.5/8.7.3/MLgw-2.07) with SMTP id PAA18165 for <ding@ifi.uio.no>; Mon, 9 Dec 1996 15:53:45 -0500 (EST)
Original-Received: from spssunp.spspme.ml.com (spssunp.spspme.ml.com [192.168.111.13]) by commpost.ml.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id PAA05405; Mon, 9 Dec 1996 15:52:05 -0500
Original-Received: by spssunp.spspme.ml.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-4.1)
	id PAA07961; Mon, 9 Dec 1996 15:50:26 -0500
Original-To: (ding) GNUS Mailing List <ding@ifi.uio.no>
X-Face: ""xJff<P[R~C67]V?J|X^Dr`YigXK|;1wX<rt^>%{>hr-{:QXl"Xk2O@@(+F]e{"%EYQiW@mUuvEsL>=mx96j12qW[%m;|:B^n{J8k?Mz[K1_+H;$v,nYx^1o_=4M,L+]FIU~[[`-w~~xsy-BX,?tAF_.8u&0y*@aCv;a}Y'{w@#*@iwAl?oZpvvv
X-Y-Zippy: Yow!  Maybe I should have asked for my Neutron Bomb in PAISLEY--
In-Reply-To: Colin Rafferty's message of 09 Dec 1996 14:40:41 -0500
Original-Lines: 28
X-Mailer: Red Gnus v0.60/XEmacs 19.14
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:9149
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:9149

About an hour ago, I wrote:
> Not ten minutes ago, I wrote:
>> Anyway, I like the idea.  I think that I should look at the code to
>> `gnus-summary-exit' now so that I can write it.

> Quick and dirty solution:

> (defun gnus-summary-checkpoint-info
>   "Checkpoint information for current summary.
> Note that this breaks `gnus-summary-exit-no-update'."
>   (interactive)
>   (gnus-summary-update-info))

> Slower but cleaner (but still dirty) is to add an (interactive) to
> `gnus-summary-update-info'.

There is another potential flaw with this.  `gnus-summary-update-info'
does the scoring and runs `gnus-exit-group-hook'.  Calling this while
not actually exiting a group will cause all sorts of things that should
only happen once to happen any number of times.  This is probably not a
good thing.

Anyway, I think that we just need to split `gnus-summary-update-info'
into two pieces: the part that saves marks, and the part that increments
calculations.

-- 
Colin