From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/7566
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Colin Rafferty <craffert@spspme.ml.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: [??] split into non-nnml
Date: 12 Aug 1996 12:55:52 -0400
Message-ID: <ocrrapcpmnb.fsf@spssunp.spspme.ml.com>
Reply-To: Colin Rafferty <craffert@ml.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035147861 7643 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:04:21 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:04:21 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no
Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id KAA06619 for <steve@miranova.com>; Mon, 12 Aug 1996 10:21:39 -0700
Original-Received: from mlfire.ml.com (mlfire.ml.com [192.246.100.1]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) 
	id <SAA18687@ifi.uio.no> for <ding@ifi.uio.no> ; Mon, 12 Aug 1996 18:56:27 +0200
Original-Received: from commpost.ml.com ([146.125.4.24]) by mlfire.ml.com (8.7.5/8.7.3/MLgw-2.05) with SMTP id MAA25157 for <ding@ifi.uio.no>; Mon, 12 Aug 1996 12:56:54 -0400 (EDT)
Original-Received: from spssunp.spspme.ml.com (spssunp.spspme.ml.com [192.168.111.13]) by commpost.ml.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id MAA25973; Mon, 12 Aug 1996 12:55:58 -0400 (EST)
Original-Received: by spssunp.spspme.ml.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-4.1)
	id MAA11371; Mon, 12 Aug 1996 12:55:53 -0400
Original-To: (ding) GNUS Mailing List <ding@ifi.uio.no>
X-Face: D>:hrrB{l6#\wU;)0R:OHSTA@ayd.Oq?s@Rrc;[+z0m+<-U"$G-J6L)F2QY`qK~uPu!s1(6{\#uy!Ag/D)?'L[}xErXvxoPn8T_hKi{M]/(`BF{e}X7;hby`p\.E$rJ}Aff#BT,rdDIw\y
X-Y-Zippy: I represent a sardine!!
Original-Lines: 9
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.2.25/XEmacs 19.14
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:7566
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:7566

I would like to have a group in my `nnmail-split-fancy' that is not
nnml.  I have `gnus-secondary-select-methods' set to nnml, but I would
like to have one kind incoming mail split be a different method.

Could anyone either point me in the right direction, or tell me that I
am out of luck?  Thank you.
-- 
This posting adheres to the SELF-DISCIPLINE guidelines for better
USENET discussions. See http://www.eiffel.com/discipline.