From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/8507 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Colin Rafferty Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: [??] gnus-demon-scan-mail Date: 28 Oct 1996 09:51:59 -0500 Message-ID: Reply-To: Colin Rafferty NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035148656 12479 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:17:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:17:36 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 4442 invoked from smtpd); 28 Oct 1996 15:41:12 -0000 Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@129.240.64.2) by deanna.miranova.com with SMTP; 28 Oct 1996 15:41:11 -0000 Original-Received: from mlfire.ml.com (mlfire.ml.com [192.246.100.1]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Mon, 28 Oct 1996 15:52:39 +0100 Original-Received: from commpost.ml.com ([146.125.4.24]) by mlfire.ml.com (8.7.5/8.7.3/MLgw-2.07) with SMTP id JAA19571 for ; Mon, 28 Oct 1996 09:54:29 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from spssunp.spspme.ml.com (spssunp.spspme.ml.com [192.168.111.13]) by commpost.ml.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id JAA01451 for ; Mon, 28 Oct 1996 09:53:05 -0500 Original-Received: by spssunp.spspme.ml.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-4.1) id JAA05789; Mon, 28 Oct 1996 09:52:00 -0500 Original-To: (ding) GNUS Mailing List X-Face: ByE+UMAp1klWR3?\RNGx(A-~Ri!YT%C6M!sxoJL+.;9`Q/|+dj7[KR>gGMyV.2qZeot0NI`4\MA^_Qg`F9=+Ox&zaE?Y9dV%F~Xzf';Zyk2Aobs.uu^Ey0_C6^~q';G#$HkA!ZAHXPpG-"*|Dd*Z4U$4y{{aI0c%75}i~Of(jxYtI[uIpYF<*Zoe|\*/ufb X-Y-Zippy: I have the power to HALT PRODUCTION on all TEENAGE SEX COMEDIES!! Original-Lines: 8 X-Mailer: Red Gnus v0.42/XEmacs 19.14 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:8507 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:8507 The function `gnus-demon-scan-mail' does good stuff. However, it does not update the article counts in my *Group* buffer. Short of doing a funky defadvice around the function, is there anything I can do to get it to update *Group*? -- This posting adheres to the SELF-DISCIPLINE guidelines for better USENET discussions. See http://www.eiffel.com/discipline.