From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/9145
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Colin Rafferty <craffert@spspme.ml.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: feature request
Date: 09 Dec 1996 14:40:41 -0500
Message-ID: <ocrwwurmrpi.fsf@spssunp.spspme.ml.com>
References: <ri7pw0ke4v4.fsf@rs5.tcs.tulane.edu> <m2ybf7d0tx.fsf@altair.xemacs.org> <ocrybf7ms6z.fsf@spssunp.spspme.ml.com>
Reply-To: Colin Rafferty <craffert@ml.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035149214 16720 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:26:54 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:26:54 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <ding-request@ifi.uio.no>
Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2])
          by deanna.miranova.com (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP
	  id MAA14613 for <steve@miranova.com>; Mon, 9 Dec 1996 12:00:37 -0800
Original-Received: from mlfire.ml.com (mlfire.ml.com [192.246.100.1]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) 
	id <UAA05539@ifi.uio.no> for <ding@ifi.uio.no> ; Mon, 9 Dec 1996 20:40:44 +0100
Original-Received: from commpost.ml.com ([146.125.4.24]) by mlfire.ml.com (8.7.5/8.7.3/MLgw-2.07) with SMTP id OAA14740 for <ding@ifi.uio.no>; Mon, 9 Dec 1996 14:43:59 -0500 (EST)
Original-Received: from spssunp.spspme.ml.com (spssunp.spspme.ml.com [192.168.111.13]) by commpost.ml.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id OAA27406 for <ding@ifi.uio.no>; Mon, 9 Dec 1996 14:42:20 -0500
Original-Received: by spssunp.spspme.ml.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-4.1)
	id OAA07619; Mon, 9 Dec 1996 14:40:42 -0500
Original-To: (ding) GNUS Mailing List <ding@ifi.uio.no>
X-Face: y,o:AU/bfCrS+zS/W"^puB!rT!G7?U1Mvp1Hd{6h^>X4@Xp5,|g+rG>4gv/iy^&x9`k#s!]X~{]Js>@A4c}4Z"Ct7=#1nPS:?mrWH8c#>$)>/Wc5yuX_OFO1(4cZM{LvsKWVQSl~/i>!n[-B*i-alq[/m\bsdy;W4p(_ic;$BE.oG@eJf@sr#x#}FT<=H8Ozu%g;JpVz:v_~vt[>ef/MeNeo3~D^R]]*bB7{HB|E1$wfMzw
X-Y-Zippy: Yow!  Now we can become alcoholics!
In-Reply-To: Colin Rafferty's message of 09 Dec 1996 14:30:12 -0500
Original-Lines: 25
X-Mailer: Red Gnus v0.60/XEmacs 19.14
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:9145
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:9145

Not ten minutes ago, I wrote:

> Anyway, I like the idea.  I think that I should look at the code to
> `gnus-summary-exit' now so that I can write it.

Quick and dirty solution:

(defun gnus-summary-checkpoint-info
  "Checkpoint information for current summary.
Note that this breaks `gnus-summary-exit-no-update'."
  (interactive)
  (gnus-summary-update-info))

Slower but cleaner (but still dirty) is to add an (interactive) to
`gnus-summary-update-info'.

> 2. This could be disastrous `gnus-summary-exit-no-update'.  At least, it
>    would be a little difficult.  It would mean that gnus would have to
>    remember what the original info of the group was, and append that to
>    the dribble on `Q'.

Therein lies the rub.

-- 
Colin