From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/31013
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois_Pinard?= <pinard@iro.umontreal.ca>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Improved (non-annoying) underlining
Date: 17 May 2000 09:35:20 -0400
Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu
Message-ID: <oqem71z4dj.fsf@titan.progiciels-bpi.ca>
References: <vxkpuqmqjky.fsf@mesquite.charcoal.com>
	<ruog0rh5rqa.fsf@g.wolfram.com> <rjd7mlfkee.fsf@zuse.dina.kvl.dk>
	<vxkvh0ds6lu.fsf@mesquite.charcoal.com> <dpn1lp8i6v.fsf@mraz.iskon.hr>
	<vxkitwds596.fsf@mesquite.charcoal.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035167473 11653 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 02:31:13 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 02:31:13 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: ding@gnus.org
Return-Path: <owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu>
Original-Received: from lisa.math.uh.edu (lisa.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.49])
	by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EABF6D0521
	for <jason@mailhost.sclp.com>; Wed, 17 May 2000 09:38:22 -0400 (EDT)
Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5])
	by lisa.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id IAB06250;
	Wed, 17 May 2000 08:38:22 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Wed, 17 May 2000 08:37:49 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: from mailhost.sclp.com (postfix@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139])
	by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA27731
	for <ding@hpc.uh.edu>; Wed, 17 May 2000 08:37:37 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: from ariel.progiciels-bpi.ca (ariel.grics.qc.ca [199.84.132.74])
	by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91165D0521
	for <ding@gnus.org>; Wed, 17 May 2000 09:37:59 -0400 (EDT)
Original-Received: by ariel.progiciels-bpi.ca (Postfix, from userid 3)
	id 1EADBC8F1; Wed, 17 May 2000 09:37:52 -0700 (EDT)
Original-Received: from titan.progiciels-bpi.ca.progiciels-bpi.ca (unknown [199.84.132.86])
	by icule.progiciels-bpi.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id AB9683090; Wed, 17 May 2000 09:35:22 -0400 (EDT)
Original-To: Karl Kleinpaste <karl@charcoal.com>
X-Face: "b_m|CE6#'Q8fliQrwHl9K,]PA_o'*S~Dva{~b1n*)K*A(BIwQW.:LY?t4~xhYka_.LV?Qq
 `}X|71X0ea&H]9Dsk!`kxBXlG;q$mLfv_vtaHK_rHFKu]4'<*LWCyUe@ZcI6"*wB5M@[m<Ok5/cC^=
 CxDhg=TJi^o[E
In-Reply-To: Karl Kleinpaste's message of "17 May 2000 08:58:13 -0400"
Original-Lines: 12
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0805 (Gnus v5.8.5) Emacs/20.6
Precedence: list
X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:31013
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:31013

Karl Kleinpaste <karl@charcoal.com> writes:

> It is only in _these words_ /vs/ _these_ _words_ that the effect can
> have any distinguishing characteristic at all, because underlining can
> affect whitespace, if one lets it.

How strange.  On this Gnus 5.8.5, in the separate "_these_ _words_",
the background colouring is _not_ interrupted for the separating space.
I think it should be...  Looks like some bug to me.

-- 
François Pinard   http://www.iro.umontreal.ca/~pinard