From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/21449 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois_Pinard?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Manage todo items with Gnus Date: 22 Feb 1999 22:04:23 -0500 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: <86aeygk4dv.fsf@slowfox.frob.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035159549 22991 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 00:19:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 00:19:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE, ding@gnus.org Return-Path: Original-Received: from fisher.math.uh.edu (fisher.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.35]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id WAA25868 for ; Mon, 22 Feb 1999 22:07:16 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by fisher.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id VAB29386; Mon, 22 Feb 1999 21:06:33 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Mon, 22 Feb 1999 21:06:53 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id VAA03940 for ; Mon, 22 Feb 1999 21:06:43 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from jupiter.rtsq.qc.ca (rtsq.grics.qc.ca [199.84.132.81]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id WAA25839 for ; Mon, 22 Feb 1999 22:06:35 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from ariel.progiciels-bpi.ca by jupiter.rtsq.qc.ca (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id WAA21239; Mon, 22 Feb 1999 22:05:06 -0500 Original-Received: from iro.umontreal.ca (uucp@localhost) by ariel.progiciels-bpi.ca (950413.SGI.8.6.12/950213.SGI) via UUCP id WAA13699; Mon, 22 Feb 1999 22:07:13 -0800 Original-Received: from titan.progiciels-bpi.ca.progiciels-bpi.ca by icule.progiciels-bpi.ca (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id WAA04047; Mon, 22 Feb 1999 22:04:41 -0500 Original-To: Alexandre Oliva X-Face: "b_m|CE6#'Q8fliQrwHl9K,]PA_o'*S~Dva{~b1n*)K*A(BIwQW.:LY?t4~xhYka_.LV?Qq `}X|71X0ea&H]9Dsk!`kxBXlG;q$mLfv_vtaHK_rHFKu]4'<*LWCyUe@ZcI6"*wB5M@[m writes: > It would be great if to-do were not a gnus back-end, just a minor > mode that could be plugged onto any other e-mail back-ends. This would > obviate the need for managing mbox files, avoinding gettign new mail, etc. > I.e., it would only have to manage priorities. I'm not sure of what the idea behind the description above. For TODO files, I just use `allout' mode, and like it very much. It is exactly what I need. Isn't Gnus something quite complex, just to manage a TODO list? What would be the incentive? -- François Pinard mailto:pinard@iro.umontreal.ca Join the free Translation Project! http://www.iro.umontreal.ca/~pinard