Gnus development mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "François Pinard" <pinard@iro.umontreal.ca>
Cc: ding@gnus.org
Subject: Re: Moving articles destroys all marks
Date: 05 Oct 1999 13:48:16 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <oqyadh8zrz.fsf@titan.progiciels-bpi.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE's message of "05 Oct 1999 18:40:21 +0200"

Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai Großjohann) écrit:
> François Pinard <pinard@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:

> > My need is simple: to be sure I do not loose articles while moving
> > them elsewhere.  In my case, the automatic reading that comes with
> > opening an article is plain unwelcome when the article has to be
> > sorted elsewhere.  My feeling is that this automatic reading should be
> > undone, automatically as much as possible -- so I just cannot forget
> > to do it.  Whatever scheme that let me sort articles as I want, and
> > is not error-prone, is acceptable to me.

> I think it would be best (and sufficient) to redefine the keys to a
> function which removes all marks first [...] then calls the normal
> move function.

This is what I did, as you might suspect, for the most common cases.

> Hm.  We want the unmarking to happen for the next N articles, or the
> process-marked articles.  And we don't want the process-mark to be
> removed.  Hm.  How is this done?

This is part of my problem!  There are many cases I do not handle properly.
I just did the most obvious or irritating cases, with some sweat and pain.
Things are more nicely done, when by Lars.  He knows Gnus pretty well :-).

But I also think I'm no extraordinary user, and that my needs could be
the needs of other users just as well, and worth sharing for this reason.
Of course, there is no single solution that makes everyone happy at once
in matters like Gnus, but the current tunability of Gnus lets me believe
that many habits can co-exist.  Maybe Lars listens? :-)

-- 
François Pinard   http://www.iro.umontreal.ca/~pinard



  parent reply	other threads:[~1999-10-05 17:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
1999-10-01 11:04 Toni Drabik
1999-10-01 13:11 ` Robert Epprecht
1999-10-01 15:00   ` Toni Drabik
1999-10-01 20:52     ` Kai Großjohann
1999-10-03 14:57       ` Toni Drabik
1999-11-06  2:38     ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
1999-11-06 16:02       ` Hrvoje Niksic
1999-10-04 20:23 ` François Pinard
1999-10-04 21:38   ` David S. Goldberg
1999-10-05 11:39     ` Kai Großjohann
1999-10-05 12:12       ` David S. Goldberg
1999-10-05 14:41         ` François Pinard
1999-10-05 16:40           ` Kai Großjohann
1999-10-05 17:30             ` David S. Goldberg
1999-10-05 17:48             ` François Pinard [this message]
1999-10-05  8:28   ` Kai Großjohann
1999-10-06 18:10   ` Toni Drabik

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=oqyadh8zrz.fsf@titan.progiciels-bpi.ca \
    --to=pinard@iro.umontreal.ca \
    --cc=ding@gnus.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).