Re: Functional requirements for Gnus

["François Pinard" <pinard@iro.umontreal.ca>]

Kai Grossjohann <grossjohann@amaunet.cs.uni-dortmund.de> writes:

> So if I understand you correctly, you are suggesting that there be one
> `concatenate everything' view of an article, and that there be the
> additional nndoc alternative, for viewing the `toc'.  If there are
> nested body parts (a multipart/alternative as the second part of a
> multipart/mixed, say), would one then be able to create two nested
> nndoc groups?  That'd be nice.

If there are nested parts (within parts), `nndoc' already gives you the
full structure legibly, using proper indentation, and you can proceed with
it without difficulty.  Creating a nested separate `nndoc' group for one
subset of a MIME message also works.  Just type `C-d' another time for a
sub-multipart in the `nndoc' group.  It's surely fun to try, but my own
feeling is that it is not very useful to do, as the first `nndoc' already
has everything you need.  If you nest many `nndoc' that way, you might
have to type `q` a few times to pop out until the main summary reappears.

-- 
François Pinard                            mailto:pinard@iro.umontreal.ca
Join the free Translation Project!    http://www.iro.umontreal.ca/~pinard