From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/16511 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois_Pinard?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Functional requirements for Gnus Date: 31 Aug 1998 10:01:48 -0400 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035155371 28246 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 23:09:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 23:09:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org Return-Path: Original-Received: from gizmo.hpc.uh.edu (gizmo.hpc.uh.edu [129.7.102.31]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA27702 for ; Mon, 31 Aug 1998 10:15:24 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (sina.hpc.uh.edu [129.7.3.5]) by gizmo.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id IAF23255; Mon, 31 Aug 1998 08:46:28 -0500 Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Mon, 31 Aug 1998 09:13:53 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [209.195.19.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id JAA08108 for ; Mon, 31 Aug 1998 09:13:43 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from pluton.rtsq.qc.ca (pluton.grics.qc.ca [199.84.132.10]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA27687 for ; Mon, 31 Aug 1998 10:13:38 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: by pluton.rtsq.qc.ca (8.8.8/8.8.8) with UUCP id KAA06536; Mon, 31 Aug 1998 10:02:32 -0400 Original-Received: by icule.progiciels-bpi.ca (8.8.5/8.7.3) id KAA01825; Mon, 31 Aug 1998 10:01:50 -0400 Original-To: Kai Grossjohann X-Face: "b_m|CE6#'Q8fliQrwHl9K,]PA_o'*S~Dva{~b1n*)K*A(BIwQW.:LY?t4~xhYka_.LV?Qq `}X|71X0ea&H]9Dsk!`kxBXlG;q$mLfv_vtaHK_rHFKu]4'<*LWCyUe@ZcI6"*wB5M@[m writes: > So if I understand you correctly, you are suggesting that there be one > `concatenate everything' view of an article, and that there be the > additional nndoc alternative, for viewing the `toc'. If there are > nested body parts (a multipart/alternative as the second part of a > multipart/mixed, say), would one then be able to create two nested > nndoc groups? That'd be nice. If there are nested parts (within parts), `nndoc' already gives you the full structure legibly, using proper indentation, and you can proceed with it without difficulty. Creating a nested separate `nndoc' group for one subset of a MIME message also works. Just type `C-d' another time for a sub-multipart in the `nndoc' group. It's surely fun to try, but my own feeling is that it is not very useful to do, as the first `nndoc' already has everything you need. If you nest many `nndoc' that way, you might have to type `q` a few times to pop out until the main summary reappears. -- François Pinard mailto:pinard@iro.umontreal.ca Join the free Translation Project! http://www.iro.umontreal.ca/~pinard