From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/45962 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Scott A Crosby Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: TMDA (was: new spam functionality added) Date: 01 Aug 2002 17:40:43 -0500 Organization: Rice University Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: <87y9brejam.fsf@mail.paradoxical.net> <873ctztyth.fsf@mail.paradoxical.net> <87bs8nsh7g.fsf@mail.paradoxical.net> <87fzxziifw.fsf@wesley.springies.com> <87ptx2wezj.fsf@mail.paradoxical.net> <861y9ip6jm.fsf@duchess.twilley.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1028241789 15735 127.0.0.1 (1 Aug 2002 22:43:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2002 22:43:09 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 17aOey-00045g-00 for ; Fri, 02 Aug 2002 00:43:08 +0200 Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu ([129.7.128.10] ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 17aOeJ-0000MY-00; Thu, 01 Aug 2002 17:42:27 -0500 Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Thu, 01 Aug 2002 17:42:54 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (qmailr@sclp3.sclp.com [209.196.61.66]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id RAA13253 for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2002 17:42:40 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: (qmail 25312 invoked by alias); 1 Aug 2002 22:40:47 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 25307 invoked from network); 1 Aug 2002 22:40:47 -0000 Original-Received: from cs.rice.edu (128.42.1.30) by gnus.org with SMTP; 1 Aug 2002 22:40:47 -0000 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cs.rice.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id A81534A9B7 for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2002 17:40:45 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from sam.cs.rice.edu (sam.cs.rice.edu [128.42.3.145]) by cs.rice.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FB9F4A9CB for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2002 17:40:44 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: by sam.cs.rice.edu (Postfix, from userid 14314) id 0679D739E5; Thu, 1 Aug 2002 17:40:43 -0500 (CDT) Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: Original-Lines: 21 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Common Lisp) X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS snapshot-20020300 Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:45962 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:45962 On Thu, 01 Aug 2002 18:23:29 -0400, prj@po.cwru.edu (Paul Jarc) writes: > Jack Twilley wrote: > > Josh Huber > > net: huber+dated+1028662344.a3e4f6@alum.wpi.edu, huber+dated+1028589381.274799@alum.wpi.edu,[...] > > So one technology will adapt to a new one. There's no reason address > books *can't* deal with dated addresses; they just happen not to at > the moment. "We were here first" is not an effective argument. How does one identify what noisy suffixes are and are not supposed to be stripped off? Contrasting above: huber+dated+1028662344.a3e4f6@alum.wpi.edu jmt+usenet@twilley.org Not to mention the dozen other TMDA-like schemes. Do what you want.. I'll just score TMDA users appropriately. Scott