From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/73582 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Robert Pluim Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Outstanding stuff? Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 13:24:34 -0400 Organization: not if I can help it Message-ID: References: <87lj5mw5y9.fsf@dod.no> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1288027504 14612 80.91.229.12 (25 Oct 2010 17:25:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 17:25:04 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M21951@lists.math.uh.edu Mon Oct 25 19:25:03 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PAQn5-0006xJ-P4 for ding-account@gmane.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 19:25:00 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PAQn1-0007Fx-8h; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 12:24:55 -0500 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PAQmz-0007Fh-MC for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 12:24:53 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PAQmy-0005uW-Gh for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 12:24:53 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1PAQmx-0005R0-00 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 19:24:51 +0200 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PAQmv-0006rp-L9 for ding@gnus.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 19:24:49 +0200 Original-Received: from lns-bzn-49f-81-56-191-143.adsl.proxad.net ([81.56.191.143]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 19:24:49 +0200 Original-Received: from rpluim by lns-bzn-49f-81-56-191-143.adsl.proxad.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 19:24:49 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 24 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lns-bzn-49f-81-56-191-143.adsl.proxad.net Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) XEmacs/21.5-b29 (cygwin32) Cancel-Lock: sha1:cn/+McJ6J0eDRw/rsyVlU9NdFkU= X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:73582 Archived-At: Steinar Bang writes: >>>>>> Robert Pluim : > >>> HOWEVER, we could just cheat and totally special-case things for >>> nnimap. That is, a new interface function >>> >>> (*-request-move-articles-internally articles from-group server to-group) >>> >>> If it exists, and the move is internal (from one group on the same IMAP >>> server to another), this would just issue COPY + \Deleted + EXPUNGE, and >>> forget about all Gnus niceties with the cache/agent/etc. > >> That would work for me. In this particular case speed is more >> important to me than features :-) > > What will it mean wrt. to uniformity for copies and moves across > backends? Will it still be possible to split from nnimap to eg. nnml > folders? I don't think nnimap -> nnml would qualify for the 'on the same IMAP server' statement Lars made there. Robert