From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/71927 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Robert Pluim Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Any juicy outstanding Gnus bugs? Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 23:09:06 +0200 Organization: not if I can help it Message-ID: References: <87mxr4s1oj.fsf@keller.adm.naquadah.org> <87iq1ss0ep.fsf@keller.adm.naquadah.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1285535378 29615 80.91.229.12 (26 Sep 2010 21:09:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 21:09:38 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M20300@lists.math.uh.edu Sun Sep 26 23:09:36 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OzyTY-0001ra-AL for ding-account@gmane.org; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 23:09:36 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1OzyTS-00033H-Cl; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 16:09:30 -0500 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1OzyTQ-000330-HS for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 16:09:28 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1OzyTP-0007uB-AP for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 16:09:28 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1OzyTO-0005dP-00 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 23:09:26 +0200 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OzyTL-0001pW-GS for ding@gnus.org; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 23:09:23 +0200 Original-Received: from lns-bzn-49f-81-56-191-143.adsl.proxad.net ([81.56.191.143]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 23:09:23 +0200 Original-Received: from rpluim by lns-bzn-49f-81-56-191-143.adsl.proxad.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 23:09:23 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 22 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lns-bzn-49f-81-56-191-143.adsl.proxad.net Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) XEmacs/21.5-b29 (cygwin32) Cancel-Lock: sha1:LCcN7c8p86O8PbPyeatx7awTEZc= X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:71927 Archived-At: Julien Danjou writes: > On Sun, Sep 26 2010, Robert Pluim wrote: > >> My description of the behaviour was incomplete: when it happens, there >> will often be many unread articles higher in the summary (I sometimes >> end up in the middle of an unread thread), plus if I exit the group and >> re-enter it I'll usually end up somewhere different, so I don't think >> it's gnus-auto-select-subject. > > I still think it is. The default was unread, and now it'ss > unseen-or-unread, which makes Gnus goes to the first unseen, and not > unread. > > Am I still wrong? :) I don't know. Leaving aside marks, for me articles have only 2 states: read and unread. What is 'unseen'? (and if it's "I have not displayed a summary line for this article before", then the new value of gnus-auto-select-subject is at best confusing, and at worst wrong :) ) Robert