From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/53789 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Xavier Maillard Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: GroupLens, efficient ? Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 08:19:07 +0200 Organization: GNU Rox ! Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1061413654 9129 80.91.224.253 (20 Aug 2003 21:07:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 21:07:34 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ding-owner+M2328@lists.math.uh.edu Wed Aug 20 23:07:32 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19paB2-0003qs-00 for ; Wed, 20 Aug 2003 23:07:32 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 19pa9v-0001CF-00; Wed, 20 Aug 2003 16:06:23 -0500 Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com ([64.157.176.121]) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 19pa9n-0001C4-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 20 Aug 2003 16:06:15 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail 43765 invoked by alias); 20 Aug 2003 21:06:15 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 43759 invoked from network); 20 Aug 2003 21:06:14 -0000 Original-Received: from rms.gnu-rox.org (HELO smtp.gnu-rox.org) (213.41.134.247) by sclp3.sclp.com with SMTP; 20 Aug 2003 21:06:14 -0000 Original-Received: from fxgs.gnu-rox.org.gnu-rox.org (fxgs.gnu-rox.org [10.0.0.10]) by smtp.gnu-rox.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5272B3E183 for ; Wed, 20 Aug 2003 23:05:43 +0200 (CEST) Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAIVBMVEX/+vCbhYr+9ur/+O75 6eH/+e1IMjn+8ugBAAD/+fHax8bXRCuDAAACSElEQVR4nG2TTWsbMRCGBcaHHBVcpeio1Pga6phC bmsUDDotCaJnXdSlp9YsLPjWy6Jj/oLcTQLzK/vO7vojTebgj/fRjGbm3RWij4vxa1qK9zFZIqbv 9dUtEXXX/r+cabnLUmui9c3TG+Dv5BD6rxenpIn4liHGGIPUv84L+aLXW0av5VkHD6ynlkHUK8/S cNUtgEpQkRbux2kuRPl0p6mjjKaIZHzuW+Z65eR3tzVmYRALm/cjmHovir1ZegwOUrvLVQ+892VZ vJpr/Fiah8a6S38Ek4xSfrlaGej5qjyUYtCY+fX0EVccAK+jnLzM1nOkfkUGqathJ54zXrqm2eLq RVM79cP7sV2BUjmGblM7bFFdnlbvMqkqBaLPKUWl7/24wosiU6za0BVVSq1Sn/xh60SOvVgXvESl 9kfgpLXwdePYFRWee8CD7LS1trEb1zkiFdb+MMcX6gZAlmD91o/2+VsoCACsXXdmAJj4O3FK1hKO SLnvB/R9WIA6S6VRibbmBOaONlifJNhozPwM7GAtDQ+WMTDmRsz9A3SzY7NjFaWcwWQDYKBjqzvu B7NlOWtA5kth+mhqAIytkdHAATMC2JCZcNZsA2IMg8WiAdCYxJEM2jLZiqaPGpImfMQQbE8GUFs5 9IpntJrxQgdgbRFpeA3Q8s9+bYKPu1y1Wo4ktR0TgeM5ppRYVz1IgYmwTiWOMOpVGogY9dSOlRik P2RFTGOE8YrhmBYHPfWv2fFYewLpDUhnoD3c8BE4kTcgyA8B9yWPf/4BOYlPlz93iwoAAAAASUVO RK5CYII= Original-To: The Gnus Mailing List Adress: zedek@gnu-rox.org X-URL: http://www.gnusfr.org X-Home-Page: http://www.gnu-rox.org X-Gpg-Key-ID: 4CE51D71 X-Gpg-Fingerprint: 298B 37DE E2EF C030 5D64 6CFF C3DA E70E 4CE5 1D71 X-Gpg-Affinity: Will accept encrypted message for GNUpg X-Disclaimer: Fourty Two X-Accept-Language: en, fr X-Face: 63TbQAY?C>dKDtNNr7 In-Reply-To: (Simon Josefsson's message of "Wed, 20 Aug 2003 01:32:19 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) Precedence: bulk Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:53789 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:53789 <#secure method=pgpmime mode=sign> --=-=-= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Simon Josefsson writes: > Xavier Maillard writes: >=20=20 > > Hello, > >=20=20 > > Today, just another question (silly one ?). When reading another > > time my Bible a.k.a. the "Gnus Manual" looking for nothing in > > particular, I faced the GroupLens feature of Gnus. > >=20=20 > > As presented in the manual, it sounded quite great to me but as a > > unexperienced user of this, I just wanted to know how efficient it > > was ? > >=20=20 > > First, is there any people using it ? And then how do you feel with > > it ? Are the predictions efficient enough to be taken seriously in > > consideration ? >=20=20 > Quoting the section: >=20=20 > NOTE: Unfortunately the GroupLens system seems to have shut down, so > this section is mostly of historical interest. Oops, I didn't see it ;) =20=20 > Perhaps the warning should be moved to the top of that section so it > isn't missed. Yes, done. Yes clearly a good thing. Sorry the disturbance zeDek --=20 alt.sex.alt.syntax.tactical No description. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA/QxLbw9rnDkzlHXERArojAJ9GylzpnmEJ1pQIEUbkvAwtHa52GQCfQw20 Ewgk/+PsXkuWFjZW5pCmPXg= =Swfm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--