From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/58525 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Xavier Maillard Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: [POLL]: gmane, gnus.ding or list ? Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 07:38:48 +0200 Organization: GNU Rox ! Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1095714266 15596 80.91.229.6 (20 Sep 2004 21:04:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 21:04:26 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ding-owner+M7063@lists.math.uh.edu Mon Sep 20 23:04:09 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13] ident=mail) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1C9VKT-00026F-00 for ; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 23:04:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1C9VHQ-0005dC-00; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 16:01:00 -0500 Original-Received: from util2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.23]) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1C9VH8-0005cl-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 16:00:42 -0500 Original-Received: from justine.libertine.org ([66.139.78.221] ident=postfix) by util2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1C9VH8-0000vT-Kf for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 16:00:42 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org (quimby.gnus.org [80.91.224.244]) by justine.libertine.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CE3F3A0058 for ; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 16:00:39 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from news by quimby.gnus.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1C9VH4-0004nq-00 for ; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 23:00:38 +0200 Original-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Path: news.gnu-rox.org!news Original-Newsgroups: gnus.ding Original-Lines: 21 Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: rms.gnu-rox.org Original-X-Trace: quimby.gnus.org 1095714038 18465 213.41.134.247 (20 Sep 2004 21:00:38 GMT) Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@quimby.gnus.org Original-NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 21:00:38 +0000 (UTC) Mail-Copies-To: never X-Attribution: zeDek X-Face: "qG{UC8GPzro#PZ!Jgisuj0]=k10 f#d596CJMPGOGwB'j\^JR2g0']N%L:ylC`?.l8u#JuS#CygUA}avHHVJJ!#ub7CxX#u]g}?z,hQ;c q%v]"[$!BfS X-Accept-Language: fr-fr, en-en, en-fr User-Agent: Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:wrJXtZYEi8Ht0SKbtTRqIprTl5g= Precedence: bulk Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:58525 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:58525 On 19 sep 2004, Jesper Harder wrote: > Reiner Steib <4.uce.03.r.s@nurfuerspam.de> writes: > > > At least in gnus.gnus-bug there's more spam then in gegg and > > other Gmane groups when filtering on gmane.spam.detected. > > Yeah, gnus-bug is really heavily hit by by spam. Maybe it'd be > nice to have it on gmane if it could increase the signal/noise > ratio. According to your taste, the recommended group is to use gmane. Why then Lars is maintaining news.gnus.org when he is doing/working on gmane ? Just curious. /me who is about to switch back to gmane... -- In Gruuik we trust