From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/53547 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Xavier Maillard Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Looking for the variable that controls newsgroup scanning Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 07:52:41 +0200 Organization: GNU Rox ! Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1059158044 12904 80.91.224.249 (25 Jul 2003 18:34:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 18:34:04 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ding-owner+M2092@lists.math.uh.edu Fri Jul 25 20:33:57 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19g7O8-0003LQ-00 for ; Fri, 25 Jul 2003 20:33:57 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 19g7Ot-00080e-00; Fri, 25 Jul 2003 13:34:43 -0500 Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com ([64.157.176.121]) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 19g7Oc-00080D-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 25 Jul 2003 13:34:26 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail 282 invoked by alias); 25 Jul 2003 18:34:26 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 276 invoked from network); 25 Jul 2003 18:34:25 -0000 Original-Received: from rms.gnu-rox.org (HELO smtp.gnu-rox.org) (213.41.134.247) by sclp3.sclp.com with SMTP; 25 Jul 2003 18:34:25 -0000 Original-Received: from fxgs.gnu-rox.org.gnu-rox.org (fxgs.gnu-rox.org [10.0.0.10]) by smtp.gnu-rox.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAE773E149 for ; Fri, 25 Jul 2003 20:33:56 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: ding@gnus.org Adress: zedek@gnu-rox.org X-URL: http://www.gnusfr.org X-Home-Page: http://www.gnu-rox.org X-Gpg-Key-ID: 4CE51D71 X-Gpg-Fingerprint: 298B 37DE E2EF C030 5D64 6CFF C3DA E70E 4CE5 1D71 X-Gpg-Affinity: Will accept encrypted message for GNUpg X-Disclaimer: Fourty Two X-Accept-Language: en, fr X-Face: 63TbQAY?C>dKDtNNr7 (Lloyd Zusman's message of "Thu, 24 Jul 2003 19:12:48 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) Precedence: bulk Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:53547 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:53547 --=-=-= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 25 jui 2003, Lloyd Zusman stated: > Xavier Maillard writes: >=20=20 > > On 23 jui 2003, Lloyd Zusman outgrape: > >=20=20 > > > I'm making use of several nnimap groups, each of which being > > > defined within `gnus-secondary-select-methods'. As far as I can > > > tell, each one is defined identically, the only difference being > > > their names. > > >=20=20 > > > However, only the first of these three gets updated during > > > `gnus-group-get-new-news'. [ ... ] > > >=20=20 > > > [ ... ] > > >=20=20 > > > Could any of you suggest some possible variables or settings that > > > might control this? > >=20=20 > > Maybe a clue : do you take advantage of (*the so cool*) (un)plug > > feature ? > >=20=20 > > Ok forget about that it can't be the source of your problems ;) > >=20=20 > > Maybe you have defined an alist of servers not to be checked during > > a g-g-g-n-n ? (at least automatically) >=20=20 > Not that I know of. Is there such an alist that's a standard part of > gnus? I did not define my own. I don't think so. > > [...] =20=20 > > Maybe your groups are not on the same level ? Maybe you inhibit > > some hooks such as gnus-get-top-news-hook or gnus-get-new-news-hook > > ? >=20=20 > Nope ... all of them are at the same level. And I invoke the > function with no argument. Hmmm... =20=20 > > Sorry if I am not clear but I am still a n00b at trying to help > > people getting out of their problems :) >=20=20 > You are quite clear, and I thank you sincerely. This just turns out > to still be a mystery to me. It is also a mystery to me. I really don't see why this happens. Did you check the availability of your servers ? Maybe only one is activated at a time ? Or there is a problem with gnus-slave ? If you find out the solution, would you mine to post it here ? I am quite interested in having it just in case it happens to me ;) Regards, zeDek --=20 "Most people deserve each other." --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA/IMWsw9rnDkzlHXERAlMMAJ4qSKdWFpjILnjhfmZ7zDfe9uZvXQCfRJfJ 935Na+VrOeFj75t6av07QVY= =Ciy9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--