From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/49361
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Xavier MAILLARD <zedek@gnu-rox.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: What method do *you* use for signing Usenet posts?
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2003 22:19:26 +0100
Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu
Message-ID: <plop874r84yh0h.fsf@gnu-rox.org>
References: <87d6mtf3tq.fsf@pooh.honeypot.net> <87znpwrjoa.fsf@unix.home>
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
	micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1043011189 12823 80.91.224.249 (19 Jan 2003 21:19:49 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2003 21:19:49 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: Kirk Strauser <kirk@strauser.com>, ding@hpc.uh.edu
Return-path: <owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu>
Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 18aMr4-0003KB-00
	for <ding-account@gmane.org>; Sun, 19 Jan 2003 22:19:47 +0100
Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu ([129.7.128.10] ident=lists)
	by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1)
	id 18aMrE-0001aC-00; Sun, 19 Jan 2003 15:19:56 -0600
Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Sun, 19 Jan 2003 15:20:52 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: from smtp.gnu-rox.org (rms.gnu-rox.org [213.41.134.247])
	by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA21566
	for <ding@hpc.uh.edu>; Sun, 19 Jan 2003 15:20:40 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by smtp.gnu-rox.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 5EA893E381; Sun, 19 Jan 2003 22:19:38 +0100 (CET)
Original-Received: from fxgsproject.org.gnu-rox.org (unknown [10.0.0.10])
	by smtp.gnu-rox.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 59C593E37D; Sun, 19 Jan 2003 22:19:36 +0100 (CET)
Original-To: deskpot@myrealbox.com (Vasily Korytov)
X-Face: 63TbQAY?C>dKDtNNr7<CEy3XxC*t"8Nw_,=:={qL$,b?m:3c'?5vo4qLo)@!(?&J3SqnvA
 %]/'!n[aEa5oAg1{+JyynaULmhA8^"tQQK*D3dNJ{.SZ0
X-In-No-Sense: Nonsense
X-Whatever: no
In-Reply-To: <87znpwrjoa.fsf@unix.home> (deskpot@myrealbox.com's message of
 "Sun, 19 Jan 2003 23:03:49 +0300")
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090013 (Oort Gnus v0.13) Emacs/21.3.50
 (i686-pc-linux-gnu)
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS new-20020517
Precedence: list
X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:49361
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:49361

--=-=-=
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, 19 Jan 2003, Vasily Korytov uttered the following:

> >>>>> "KS" =3D=3D Kirk Strauser writes:
>=20=20
>   KS> 2) Some mailers and newsreaders freak out when they see
>   KS>    attachments ("Hey, I know, I'll just display a blank
>   KS>    message!").
>=20=20
>  Correct, some Usenet readers are not MIME-compatible. Personally I
>  try not to use MIME on Usenet. If you want PGP in Usenet, better use
>  the RFC1991-compatible version.

Yup
=20=20
>   KS> 3) Some people freak out when they see plaintext signatures
>   KS>    inserted at the end of an email message ("Your computer must
>   KS>    be broken because I couldn't read that last part of your
>   KS>    email.").
>=20=20
>  You can safely tell them: RTFM. And/or get a better newsreader. =3D))

Argh ! You have preceded me :) It is exactly what I would have said ;-)

zeDek

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+KxZew9rnDkzlHXERAiWmAJ9MqrFEDwylJrWVgFFOVRKNs/szbQCfa5Mm
yTAWe+QZiD/kSwiM1hefKws=
=zP+9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--