From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/47227
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Xavier MAILLARD <zedek@gnu-rox.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: admin-adress purpose ?
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 18:03:26 +0200
Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu
Message-ID: <plop874rbmtlpt.fsf@fxgsproject.org>
References: <plop87fzv7lkun.fsf@fxgsproject.org>
	<87hefnwlgd.fsf@crybaby.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
	<plop87adlf1kzy.fsf@fxgsproject.org>
	<87vg42g979.fsf@crybaby.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
	<plop87d6qawmlm.fsf@fxgsproject.org>
	<871y6qo5xv.fsf@crybaby.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
	<plop877kgiwjut.fsf@fxgsproject.org>
	<844rbmpiqq.fsf@crybaby.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
	<plop87zntev2u1.fsf@fxgsproject.org>
	<84k7kio125.fsf@crybaby.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1034784368 10725 80.91.224.249 (16 Oct 2002 16:06:08 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 16:06:08 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: Xavier MAILLARD <zedek@gnu-rox.org>, ding@gnus.org
Return-path: <owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu>
Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 181qgI-0002la-00
	for <ding-account@gmane.org>; Wed, 16 Oct 2002 18:06:02 +0200
Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu ([129.7.128.10] ident=lists)
	by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1)
	id 181qfz-0004Ou-00; Wed, 16 Oct 2002 11:05:39 -0500
Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Wed, 16 Oct 2002 11:06:21 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (qmailr@sclp3.sclp.com [209.196.61.66])
	by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id LAA05484
	for <ding@hpc.uh.edu>; Wed, 16 Oct 2002 11:06:06 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: (qmail 9700 invoked by alias); 16 Oct 2002 16:05:20 -0000
Original-Received: (qmail 9695 invoked from network); 16 Oct 2002 16:05:19 -0000
Original-Received: from rms.gnu-rox.org (HELO smtp.gnu-rox.org) (213.41.134.247)
  by gnus.org with SMTP; 16 Oct 2002 16:05:19 -0000
Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by smtp.gnu-rox.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 9DD6A4011B; Wed, 16 Oct 2002 18:05:30 +0200 (CEST)
Original-Received: from fxgsproject.org.gnu-rox.org (unknown [10.0.0.3])
	by smtp.gnu-rox.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id D26C84011B; Wed, 16 Oct 2002 18:05:26 +0200 (CEST)
Original-To: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai =?iso-8859-15?q?Gro=DFjohann?=)
X-Face: 63TbQAY?C>dKDtNNr7<CEy3XxC*t"8Nw_,=:={qL$,b?m:3c'?5vo4qLo)@!(?&J3SqnvA
 %]/'!n[aEa5oAg1{+JyynaULmhA8^"tQQK*D3dNJ{.SZ0
X-In-No-Sense: Nonsense
X-Whatever: no
In-Reply-To: <84k7kio125.fsf@crybaby.cs.uni-dortmund.de> (Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE's
 message of "Wed, 16 Oct 2002 17:28:34 +0200")
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090008 (Oort Gnus v0.08) Emacs/21.2
 (i386-debian-linux-gnu)
X-Scanned-By: AMaViS using clamscan / ClamAV (OpenSource AntiVirus solution)
Precedence: list
X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:47227
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:47227

Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai Großjohann) disait récemment que :

> [...]
> I think it is better if one person configures something, instead of
> hundreds of people.  Therefore I believe that the headers should be
> used, if present.

No problem :)

> Is this clear?  Is it clear why I think that ditching the headers in
> favor of group parameters is stupid?

Sure I understand :) 
>
> kai