Lloyd Zusman <ljz@asfast.com> writes:

>  kai.grossjohann@gmx.net (Kai Großjohann) writes:
>  
> >  Lloyd Zusman <ljz@asfast.com> writes:
> >  
> > >  Well, I mentioned in a subsequent message (that you probably
> > >  didn't get to yet) that the groups are all at the same level).
> >  
> >  Ah, hm.  So you have several nnimap groups, all from the same
> >  server, and they behave differently?  Weird.
>  
>  Yep.
>  
> >  You could also try `G e' on those groups to see if the select
> >  method is the same.  Sometimes, people have "nnimap:foo" (including
> >  the quotes) for some groups and (nnimap "foo" ...) (including the
> >  parentheses) for others.  Please convert them all to the
> >  "nnimap:foo" variant.
> >  
> >  Does `G E' show a difference?
>  
>  I checked `G e' and `G E', and all look equivalent.  And in each
>  case, it's "nnimap:foo" and not (nnimap "foo" ...).
>  
>  And did I mention that when I'm in the summary buffer for any of
>  these groups, invoking `gnus-summary-rescan-group' will always
>  correctly detect new messages for each nnimap server?  It's only
>  `gnus-group-get-new-news' that fails to do that for the 2nd through
>  n-th imap groups.

You may have hit a bug in that function then or you have a special
setup that prevents it from doing its job the right way. 

zeDek
-- 
"Now you're not going to say anything of sense or that is worthwhile to
 read... but you're going to post it anyways, as usual, right?"
       	  	..neulich in d.o.l.a. - er muss ueber Jost gestolpert sein....