From: Xavier Maillard <zedek@gnu-rox.org>
Subject: Re: Spam.el tutorial
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 06:29:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <plop87ad5sqafu.fsf@gnu-rox.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4nekv4be8i.fsf@collins.bwh.harvard.edu> (Ted Zlatanov's message of "Tue, 16 Dec 2003 17:16:13 -0500")
Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com> disait récemment que :
> On Tue, 16 Dec 2003, kai@emptydomain.de wrote:
>
>> I think *now* I understand: spam-autodetect can do like spam-split,
>> but without splitting.
>
> Yes, using all articles or only the unseen ones (default is unseen).
> When you enter an autodetected group you'll basically run spam-split
> on all those articles. But you can specify whatever spam-split
> methods you want to use.
>
>> For me, spam splitting is done on the server side with bogofilter,
>> and there is no easy way for me to tell Gnus to invoke bogofilter on
>> the server side. So spam-autodetect is out, I guess.
>
> You can still use spam-use-BBDB, spam-use-blacklist,
> spam-use-blackholes, etc.
Is it recommended to 'mix' the spam methods ? I mean if I want to use
all spam methods at once, is this supposed to work or may I expect some
bad side effects (except the slowness of spam detection) ?
>> (I'd need a local bogofilter database it seems. Wonder whether it's
>> worth it. Maybe NOCEM can help? What does it do, anyway? There is
>> a vague connection between NOCEM and spam in my mind.)
>
[...]
> I've promised I'll stop adding spam.el features, so I won't do this
> for No Gnus, but the next features of spam.el will be mass spam
Are we in the No Gnus development cycle yet ? I asked it not that long
and nobody answered.
> detection and better summary display of spam. Mass spam detection
> will be able to invoke certain programs once for a whole bunch of
> articles, which will make spam autodetection much faster. In fact,
> people may start using spam autodetection instead of incoming mail
> splitting :)
Does this mean incoming mail splitting for spam will disappear soon ? I
am currently actively testing your spam autodetection new features and
it really works/rocks :)
> Ted
--
.o. Xavier Maillard Tel: +33 6 62 59 68 62
..o
ooo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-12-17 5:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-12-14 2:25 Xavier Maillard
2003-12-14 3:40 ` Ted Zlatanov
2003-12-14 12:28 ` Reiner Steib
2003-12-14 22:38 ` Xavier Maillard
2003-12-16 19:10 ` Kai Grossjohann
2003-12-16 20:57 ` Ted Zlatanov
2003-12-16 21:12 ` Kai Grossjohann
2003-12-16 21:16 ` Kai Grossjohann
2003-12-16 22:16 ` Ted Zlatanov
2003-12-17 5:29 ` Xavier Maillard [this message]
2003-12-17 16:49 ` Ted Zlatanov
2003-12-17 22:26 ` Xavier Maillard
2003-12-18 16:35 ` Ted Zlatanov
2003-12-19 10:38 ` Xavier Maillard
2003-12-17 5:33 ` Xavier Maillard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=plop87ad5sqafu.fsf@gnu-rox.org \
--to=zedek@gnu-rox.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).