From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/53410
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Xavier Maillard <zedek@gnu-rox.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: [POLL]: Procmail or native gnus splitting ?
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2003 08:37:57 +0200
Organization: GNU Rox !
Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu
Message-ID: <plop87el0xsh4q.fsf@gnu-rox.org>
Reply-To: ding@gnus.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
	micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1058087023 28158 80.91.224.249 (13 Jul 2003 09:03:43 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2003 09:03:43 +0000 (UTC)
Original-X-From: ding-owner+M1954@lists.math.uh.edu Sun Jul 13 11:03:41 2003
Return-path: <ding-owner+M1954@lists.math.uh.edu>
Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 19bclg-0007Jt-00
	for <ding-account@gmane.org>; Sun, 13 Jul 2003 11:03:41 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu)
	by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1)
	id 19bckt-0000Um-00; Sun, 13 Jul 2003 04:02:51 -0500
Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com ([64.157.176.121])
	by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1)
	id 19bckZ-0000UU-00
	for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sun, 13 Jul 2003 04:02:31 -0500
Original-Received: (qmail 71930 invoked by alias); 13 Jul 2003 09:02:30 -0000
Original-Received: (qmail 71923 invoked from network); 13 Jul 2003 09:02:30 -0000
Original-Received: from rms.gnu-rox.org (HELO smtp.gnu-rox.org) (213.41.134.247)
  by sclp3.sclp.com with SMTP; 13 Jul 2003 09:02:30 -0000
Original-Received: from fxgs.gnu-rox.org.gnu-rox.org (fxgs.local.gnu-rox.org [10.0.0.10])
	by smtp.gnu-rox.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 340ED3E15E
	for <ding@gnus.org>; Sun, 13 Jul 2003 11:02:01 +0200 (CEST)
Original-To: ding@gnus.org
Adress: zedek@gnu-rox.org
X-URL: http://www.gnusfr.org
X-Home-Page: http://www.gnu-rox.org
X-Gpg-Key-ID: 4CE51D71
X-Gpg-Fingerprint: 298B 37DE E2EF C030 5D64 6CFF C3DA E70E 4CE5 1D71
X-Gpg-Affinity: Will accept encrypted message for GNUpg
X-Disclaimer: Fourty Two
X-Accept-Language: en, fr
Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org
X-Face: 63TbQAY?C>dKDtNNr7<CEy3XxC*t"8Nw_,=:={qL$,b?m:3c'?5vo4qLo)@!(?&J3SqnvA
 %]/'!n[aEa5oAg1{+JyynaULmhA8^"tQQK*D3dNJ{.SZ0
X-In-No-Sense: Nonsense
X-Whatever: no
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux)
Precedence: bulk
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:53410
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:53410

--=-=-=
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hello,

I am just submitting a poll on every Gnus board I can to ask people
what do they use to classify theirs mails.

It is a consequence of the redaction of an article on 'how to get IMAP
and Gnus play fairly together' on the Gnus French site [1]. There, I've
been told not to talk about nnimap splitting feature because numerous
people used to use procmail base filter to split their incoming mails.

As I don't (use procmail), I would like to know the percentage of Gnus user=
 using the
native (awesome) splitting feature of Gnus.

In the same way, does procmail allows Gnus or any other MUA, to poll
their mails directly or does it force the use of another 3rd party tool
such as fetchmail to achieve this task ?

Sorry to bother but as long as nobody can show me the benefit at using
procmail/fetmail stuff, I don't really see the point ;) The only thing
I was told is that it is easier to switch my MUA when using
procmail. But how somebody can change from Gnus to another one ? :)

Regards,

zeDek

Footnotes:=20
[1] http://gnusfr.org
--=20
http://www.gnusfr.org -- French Gnus user site

Anti-war disclaimer:
	"Bombing for peace is like fucking for virginity"

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQA/DltHw9rnDkzlHXERAlj0AJ9dzJzFlnVZGIgHyPxgXNVdTMlyxgCeKJHD
L0rswtUNQvtwtZRnetfBUW4=
=8lHI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--