Gnus development mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Xavier Maillard <zedek@gnu-rox.org>
Subject: Re: Arghh, my Gnus is going crazy !!
Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 00:29:00 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <plop87k6uivv83.fsf@gnu-rox.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <uzn3e2w8p.fsf@vignette.com>

On 25 sep 2004, Kevin Greiner wrote:

> Xavier Maillard <zedek@gnu-rox.org> writes:
> 

 [ ... ]

> > Something is doing concatenation somewhere (look 794, 795 and
> > the 794795). What is that ????
> > 
> > Thank you for any hint on fixing this.
> 
> This is actually a very old problem. We've made very little
> progress with it, hence the gnus-agent-check-overview-buffer
> function, as it is rarely reproducable. I suspect that the
> actual bug is in your server and that it is sending you bad
> headers.
> 
> Let's try this first:
> 
> Delete the group's .overview and .agentview so that you fetch
> all new headers from nntp.

Problem with such tecnic is that AFAIK, it makes forget the
marks :(

> Customize nntp-nov-is-evil to set it to t. Try to open the
> group, if the problem has gone away then we know that your
> server's nov database is corrupt.

Nothing change. Err, at least, rmoving .agentview/.overview and
doing C-k on the group is the only solution I know. When doing
that, something seems to "fix" the problem.

> If that doesn't fix it, would you be willing to do a little
> debugging for me?
> 
> If so, please do the following.
> 
> Then do
> M-x load-library<ret>gnus-agent.el<ret>
> M-x gnus
> M-x debug-on-entry<ret>gnus-agent-check-overview-buffer<ret>
> 
> Now try to open the group's summary buffer. This should launch
> the debugger.

Yes it did.
 
> If I've gotten this right, the stack trace should show that
> gnus-agent-check-overview-buffer was called by
> gnus-agent-fetch-headers. The current buffer should contain the

Not exactly but no problem.

> raw headers returned by nntp. How do they look? If they look

I didn't get any "raw nntp headrs" buffer here. When it say it
entered function blah-blah, hitting on 'c' open the summary
buffer.

-- 
"sometimes i feel like we're making emacs better and better because we don't 
 know what to do with emacs once it is finished."

    -- AlexSchroeder on #emacs @OPN




  reply	other threads:[~2004-09-25 22:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-09-25 12:38 Xavier Maillard
2004-09-25 15:39 ` Kevin Greiner
2004-09-25 22:29   ` Xavier Maillard [this message]
2004-09-25 22:54     ` Kevin Greiner
2004-09-26 18:29       ` test
2004-09-27 23:30         ` Kevin Greiner
2004-09-28  6:22           ` Xavier Maillard
2004-09-29 22:13             ` Wes Hardaker
2004-09-30  1:46             ` Kevin Greiner
2004-09-30  4:39               ` test
2004-09-25 15:47 ` Kevin Greiner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=plop87k6uivv83.fsf@gnu-rox.org \
    --to=zedek@gnu-rox.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).