From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/55065 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Xavier Maillard Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: gnus-registry, speed up splitting ? Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2003 07:33:09 +0100 Organization: GNU Rox ! Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Message-ID: References: <4nllpwfdyu.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu> <4n8ylwuh1b.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1070403351 26921 80.91.224.253 (2 Dec 2003 22:15:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 22:15:51 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ding-owner+M3605@lists.math.uh.edu Tue Dec 02 23:15:49 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1ARIo8-0004LW-00 for ; Tue, 02 Dec 2003 23:15:49 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1ARInk-0004Kv-00; Tue, 02 Dec 2003 16:15:24 -0600 Original-Received: from justine.libertine.org ([66.139.78.221] ident=postfix) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1ARInV-0004KW-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 02 Dec 2003 16:15:09 -0600 Original-Received: from smtp.gnu-rox.org (rms.gnu-rox.org [213.41.134.247]) by justine.libertine.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 083FA3A0085 for ; Tue, 2 Dec 2003 16:15:06 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from totoz.gnu-rox.org.gnu-rox.org (totoz.gnu-rox.org [10.0.0.3]) by smtp.gnu-rox.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 944283E020 for ; Tue, 2 Dec 2003 23:15:02 +0100 (CET) Original-To: ding@gnus.org X-Whatever: no X-Url-GnusFr: http://www.gnusfr.org X-Url-EmacsFr: http://www.emacsfr.org X-In-No-Sense: Nonsense X-Home-Page: http://www.gnu-rox.org/~zedek/cgi-bin/wiki.pl X-Gpg-Key-ID: 1E028EA5 X-Gpg-Fingerprint: FDB0 EE1F 33E5 8C22 5E3E 96E7 6900 CA9B 1E02 8EA5 X-Gpg-Affinity: Will accept encrypted message for GNUpg X-Face: 63TbQAY?C>dKDtNNr7 (Ted Zlatanov's message of "Mon, 01 Dec 2003 20:47:44 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) Precedence: bulk Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:55065 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:55065 Ted Zlatanov disait r=E9cemment que : > On Mon, 01 Dec 2003, zedek@gnu-rox.org wrote: > >> Ted Zlatanov disait r=E9cemment que : >>=20 >>> On Sun, 30 Nov 2003, zedek@gnu-rox.org wrote: >>> >>>> Since I use gnus-registry stuff, it seems to me that my gnus is >>>> much more responsive especially when splitting. >>>>=20 >>>> Does anybody have the same impression or is it the 'fault' of my >>>> new laptop ? >>> >>> Do you mean "less responsive"? I'll assume so. >>=20 >> No I had the impression (but I may be wrong), that it was quicker ;) > > OK, your subject header was misleading, it seemed you want me to > "speed up splitting." I undertsand now. Maybe the registry is > finding matches sooner, so the rest of the spam checks don't need to > be made? Yeah maybe. Do you (or don't you think) that increasing 'gnus-registry-max-entries' value could speed-up things ? What is the *real* impact of setting this variable to a low-value or a high-value ? > As you can see, I can provide plausible reasons for why the registry > would make things slower or faster :) It's not a O(1) operation, > that's the bottom line. The speed depends on too many things. Yes I can understand that but anyway, 2 months ago, it didn't work at all for me (remember my posts) and now, it is just great ;) > Ted zeDek