From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/55037 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Xavier Maillard Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: gnus-registry, speed up splitting ? Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2003 23:51:16 +0100 Organization: GNU Rox ! Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Message-ID: References: <4nllpwfdyu.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1070320092 25081 80.91.224.253 (1 Dec 2003 23:08:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 23:08:12 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ding-owner+M3577@lists.math.uh.edu Tue Dec 02 00:08:09 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AQx9F-0007Bg-00 for ; Tue, 02 Dec 2003 00:08:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1AQx95-0007l5-00; Mon, 01 Dec 2003 17:07:59 -0600 Original-Received: from justine.libertine.org ([66.139.78.221] ident=postfix) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1AQx8y-0007kz-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 01 Dec 2003 17:07:52 -0600 Original-Received: from smtp.gnu-rox.org (rms.gnu-rox.org [213.41.134.247]) by justine.libertine.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2857F3A0025 for ; Mon, 1 Dec 2003 17:07:51 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from totoz.gnu-rox.org.gnu-rox.org (totoz.gnu-rox.org [10.0.0.3]) by smtp.gnu-rox.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F94644344 for ; Mon, 1 Dec 2003 23:51:16 +0100 (CET) Original-To: ding@gnus.org X-Whatever: no X-Url-GnusFr: http://www.gnusfr.org X-Url-EmacsFr: http://www.emacsfr.org X-In-No-Sense: Nonsense X-Home-Page: http://www.gnu-rox.org/~zedek/cgi-bin/wiki.pl X-Gpg-Key-ID: 1E028EA5 X-Gpg-Fingerprint: FDB0 EE1F 33E5 8C22 5E3E 96E7 6900 CA9B 1E02 8EA5 X-Gpg-Affinity: Will accept encrypted message for GNUpg X-Face: 63TbQAY?C>dKDtNNr7 (Ted Zlatanov's message of "Mon, 01 Dec 2003 16:03:05 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) Precedence: bulk Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:55037 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:55037 Ted Zlatanov disait r=E9cemment que : > On Sun, 30 Nov 2003, zedek@gnu-rox.org wrote: > >> Since I use gnus-registry stuff, it seems to me that my gnus is much >> more responsive especially when splitting. >>=20 >> Does anybody have the same impression or is it the 'fault' of my new >> laptop ? > > Do you mean "less responsive"? I'll assume so. No I had the impression (but I may be wrong), that it was quicker ;) > Of course, any extra processing done while splitting will mean that > splitting takes longer. There's no way to avoid that. The registry > uses hashtables to speed up lookups - they should be quite fast. > Regardless, for every reference in the article, we look up the groups > it is in - we exit at the first match, but that may still go through > all the references in the worst case. > > If you want, look at the code and see if there are any obvious > inefficient parts. I tried to implement it for speed. I will try but I am quite busy atm :) > Ted zeDek