From: Xavier Maillard <zedek@gnu-rox.org>
Subject: Re: Dumplicated 'To' fields
Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2003 05:03:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <plop87vfvng8w7.fsf@gnu-rox.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <iluisroks1v.fsf@latte.josefsson.org> (Simon Josefsson's message of "Tue, 03 Jun 2003 00:55:56 +0200")
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1973 bytes --]
On 3 jun 2003, Simon Josefsson outgrape:
> Jesper Harder <harder@myrealbox.com> writes:
>
> > Simon Josefsson <jas@extundo.com> writes:
> >
> > > Jesper Harder <harder@myrealbox.com> writes:
> > >
> > > > Simon Josefsson <jas@extundo.com> writes:
> > >
> > > > > It is valid, so it should work.
> > > >
> > > > Nope, multiple To fields are not allowed, cf. the table in RFC
> > > > 2822, Section 3.6.
> > >
> > > See RFC 2822 4.5 for the obs-to field definition, which is
> > > identical to the to field definition, but can occur several
> > > times.
> >
> > Ah, yes you're right -- it's obsolete, but clients should still be
> > able to interpret it.
>
> Perhaps Gnus could warn if the user types multiple To: lines though?
Not a too bad idea. In fact I don't really know why user can enter 2 or
more 'To' fields. That doesn't sound natural to me.
> OTOH, minibuffer queries are pure evil, so the warning must be
> non-obtrusive if it is present at all. Perhaps coloring the second
> To red and having a balloon help with information would work; or some
> tty-friendlier variation of the same idea.
Seems good.
> Perhaps other message.el warnings could be recast like this too. The
> non-legible character set question would be really nice to get rid of
> IMHO. Just highlight the illegible text in the message buffer, and
> when the user sends the message, really do send it.
That's an idea we can work on and maybe generalize to all the same
situation. I vote for.
Thanx for all your enlightenments and your quick and clear answers
guys. Maybe some day I will read the mail dedicated RFCs. BTW, which
RFCs are the most important ? I mean which one should be read and known
for somebody wnating to hack a little more into the Gnus core ?
zeDek
--
http://www.gnusfr.org -- French Gnus user site
Anti-war disclaimer:
"Bombing for peace is like fucking for virginity"
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 188 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-06-03 3:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-06-02 6:38 Xavier Maillard
2003-06-02 20:38 ` Simon Josefsson
2003-06-02 20:56 ` Jesper Harder
2003-06-02 21:23 ` Simon Josefsson
2003-06-02 22:38 ` Jesper Harder
2003-06-02 22:55 ` Simon Josefsson
2003-06-03 3:03 ` Xavier Maillard [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=plop87vfvng8w7.fsf@gnu-rox.org \
--to=zedek@gnu-rox.org \
--cc=ding@gnus.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).