From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/52982 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Xavier Maillard Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Dumplicated 'To' fields Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2003 05:03:20 +0200 Organization: GNU Rox ! Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Message-ID: References: Reply-To: ding@gnus.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1054611642 19510 80.91.224.249 (3 Jun 2003 03:40:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 03:40:42 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ding-owner+M1526@lists.math.uh.edu Tue Jun 03 05:40:40 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19N2f0-00054M-00 for ; Tue, 03 Jun 2003 05:40:30 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 19N2gi-0004ll-00; Mon, 02 Jun 2003 22:42:16 -0500 Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com ([64.157.176.121]) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 19N25k-0004k3-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 02 Jun 2003 22:04:04 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail 25914 invoked by alias); 3 Jun 2003 03:04:04 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 25909 invoked from network); 3 Jun 2003 03:04:03 -0000 Original-Received: from rms.gnu-rox.org (HELO smtp.gnu-rox.org) (213.41.134.247) by sclp3.sclp.com with SMTP; 3 Jun 2003 03:04:03 -0000 Original-Received: from fxgs.gnu-rox.org.gnu-rox.org (fxgs.gnu-rox.org [10.0.0.10]) by smtp.gnu-rox.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 070923E12E for ; Tue, 3 Jun 2003 05:03:36 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: ding@gnus.org Adress: zedek@gnu-rox.org X-URL: http://www.gnusfr.org X-Home-Page: http://www.gnu-rox.org X-Gpg-Key-ID: 4CE51D71 X-Gpg-Fingerprint: 298B 37DE E2EF C030 5D64 6CFF C3DA E70E 4CE5 1D71 X-Gpg-Affinity: Will accept encrypted message for GNUpg X-Disclaimer: Fourty Two X-Accept-Language: en, fr Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org X-Face: 63TbQAY?C>dKDtNNr7 (Simon Josefsson's message of "Tue, 03 Jun 2003 00:55:56 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) Precedence: bulk Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:52982 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:52982 --=-=-= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 3 jun 2003, Simon Josefsson outgrape: > Jesper Harder writes: >=20=20 > > Simon Josefsson writes: > >=20=20 > > > Jesper Harder writes: > > >=20=20 > > > > Simon Josefsson writes: > > >=20=20 > > > > > It is valid, so it should work. > > > >=20=20 > > > > Nope, multiple To fields are not allowed, cf. the table in RFC > > > > 2822, Section 3.6. > > >=20=20 > > > See RFC 2822 4.5 for the obs-to field definition, which is > > > identical to the to field definition, but can occur several > > > times. > >=20=20 > > Ah, yes you're right -- it's obsolete, but clients should still be > > able to interpret it. >=20=20 > Perhaps Gnus could warn if the user types multiple To: lines though? Not a too bad idea. In fact I don't really know why user can enter 2 or more 'To' fields. That doesn't sound natural to me. > OTOH, minibuffer queries are pure evil, so the warning must be > non-obtrusive if it is present at all. Perhaps coloring the second > To red and having a balloon help with information would work; or some > tty-friendlier variation of the same idea. Seems good. =20=20 > Perhaps other message.el warnings could be recast like this too. The > non-legible character set question would be really nice to get rid of > IMHO. Just highlight the illegible text in the message buffer, and > when the user sends the message, really do send it. That's an idea we can work on and maybe generalize to all the same situation. I vote for. Thanx for all your enlightenments and your quick and clear answers guys. Maybe some day I will read the mail dedicated RFCs. BTW, which RFCs are the most important ? I mean which one should be read and known for somebody wnating to hack a little more into the Gnus core ? zeDek --=20 http://www.gnusfr.org -- French Gnus user site Anti-war disclaimer: "Bombing for peace is like fucking for virginity" --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA+3A/6w9rnDkzlHXERAhkfAKCXzf/WZOyCsYembhZRyjmJSkV0SgCeMJ7Y XB0nlJZlE0CgXVsdeXdqYR4= =GYQ+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--