From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/35037
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Jason R. Mastaler" <jason@mastaler.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: `user-mail-address' for message-ids
Date: 27 Feb 2001 14:44:34 -0700
Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu
Message-ID: <puizof7ls1p.fsf@rp17.acl.lanl.gov>
References: <20010223133030.B14991@mastaler.com>
	<m3elwpi07k.fsf@multivac.student.cwru.edu>
	<puid7c9c9y7.fsf@mastaler.com>
	<m31ysphvj5.fsf@multivac.student.cwru.edu>
	<pui4rxlc8ij.fsf@mastaler.com>
	<vafhf1knv10.fsf@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
	<ilupug8qc1j.fsf@barbar.josefsson.org>
	<puipug4nihc.fsf@cyan.acl.lanl.gov>
	<vaf1yskqapq.fsf@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
	<puid7c4nh80.fsf@cyan.acl.lanl.gov>
	<vaf3dd0oups.fsf@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=""
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035170846 865 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 03:27:26 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 03:27:26 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu>
Original-Received: from lisa.math.uh.edu (lisa.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.49])
	by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7F70D049D
	for <jason@mastaler.com>; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 16:46:16 -0500 (EST)
Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5])
	by lisa.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAB22339;
	Tue, 27 Feb 2001 15:44:59 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Tue, 27 Feb 2001 15:44:20 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: from mailhost.sclp.com (postfix@66-209.196.61.interliant.com [209.196.61.66] (may be forged))
	by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA15302
	for <ding@hpc.uh.edu>; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 15:44:07 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: from acl.lanl.gov (acl.lanl.gov [128.165.147.1])
	by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33565D049D
	for <ding@gnus.org>; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 16:44:37 -0500 (EST)
Original-Received: from rp17.acl.lanl.gov (root@rp17.acl.lanl.gov [128.165.146.17]) by acl.lanl.gov (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA9355611; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 14:44:35 -0700 (MST)
Original-Received: (from jasonrm@localhost)
	by rp17.acl.lanl.gov (8.9.3/8.8.8) id OAA01033;
	Tue, 27 Feb 2001 14:44:35 -0700
Original-To: ding@gnus.org
Mail-Copies-To: never
In-Reply-To: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE's message of "27 Feb 2001 19:18:39 +0100"
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) XEmacs/21.1 (Channel Islands)
Precedence: list
X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7
Original-Lines: 12
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:35037
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:35037

Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai Gro=DFjohann) writes:

> Ah, right.  Others violate the standard, so let's do it, too.
> Right.  Way to go.  Argh!

But you haven't provided any proof of this "standard" of requiring the
fqdn (and nothing else) of the running system to make up the rhs.

I may be wrong, but it doesn't seem likely to me that several distinct
and intelligent groups of software developers (mutt, mozilla, qmail,
etc..) would have goofed so badly if this is an established standard.