From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/9795
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: dave edmondson <dme@sco.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Gnus, movemail, POP3, trailing empty lines
Date: 04 Feb 1997 10:14:44 +0000
Sender: dme@sco.com
Message-ID: <q2eiv48nai3.fsf@zero-gravity.dme.wild-things.com>
References: <vafn2tl3obi.fsf@ls6.informatik.uni-dortmund.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.101)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035149766 20602 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:36:06 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:36:06 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: Ding-Gnus Mailing List <ding@ifi.uio.no>, Michael.Huehne@germany.eu.net
Return-Path: <ding-request@ifi.uio.no>
Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2])
	by deanna.miranova.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id CAA11820
	for <steve@miranova.com>; Tue, 4 Feb 1997 02:44:01 -0800
Original-Received: from zero-gravity.dme.wild-things.com (zero-gravity.netlab.london.sco.com [150.126.252.16]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) 
	id <LAA20011@ifi.uio.no> for <ding@ifi.uio.no> ; Tue, 4 Feb 1997 11:16:59 +0100
Original-Received: (from dme@localhost) by zero-gravity.dme.wild-things.com (8.8.4/dme/nice-1.1) id KAA27368; Tue, 4 Feb 1997 10:14:45 GMT
Original-To: Kai Grossjohann <grossjohann@charly.informatik.uni-dortmund.de>
In-Reply-To: Kai Grossjohann's message of 03 Feb 1997 16:24:17 +0100
Original-Lines: 8
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.7/XEmacs 20.0
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:9795
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:9795

surely discussions about delivery agent are secondary.  the first
thing i'd check is that the pop server is actually dishing the
messages out in distinct pieces.  if this is the case, then movemail
should be coerced into generating a correct mailbox file (ie. it
should be told to ensure that there is a \n\nFrom seperator).  if the
pop server _doesn't_ give out these two as seperate messages, then
perhaps it and the delivery agent on the pop serving machine should be
examined.