From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/72845 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Riley Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: splitting working now : some issues/questions Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2010 08:57:34 +0200 Organization: aich tea tea pea dicky riley dot net Message-ID: References: <9i4ocwyc69.fsf@news.eternal-september.org> <87wrpstwvz.fsf@lifelogs.com> <8uy6a67ugj.fsf@news.eternal-september.org> <87sk0ek21m.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1286693879 13744 80.91.229.12 (10 Oct 2010 06:57:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2010 06:57:59 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org To: Ted Zlatanov Original-X-From: ding-owner+M21217@lists.math.uh.edu Sun Oct 10 08:57:57 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P4pr2-0002ua-FG for ding-account@gmane.org; Sun, 10 Oct 2010 08:57:56 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1P4pqp-0000yD-NH; Sun, 10 Oct 2010 01:57:43 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1P4pqn-0000xu-Po for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sun, 10 Oct 2010 01:57:41 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1P4pqm-0001ZH-EX for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sun, 10 Oct 2010 01:57:41 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-bw0-f44.google.com ([209.85.214.44]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1P4pql-0003bi-00 for ; Sun, 10 Oct 2010 08:57:39 +0200 Original-Received: by bwz14 with SMTP id 14so687546bwz.17 for ; Sat, 09 Oct 2010 23:57:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:cc:subject :organization:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent :mime-version:content-type; bh=dIQiMkSa/YFVVbqTrdaP8q8ma8tZgQ64aWjKmvKEwYI=; b=AM4yKHqoIXPcMnKRr3LZd4wn7Sdsofu62Pepao8uvd8F2HLC4LpzJqCjLs1DbIfM3t pfNjHTcWJQ/v5fXXUwD/Kc6zZnEj0cSQ7XhcTLgbJTtx1AYtvoc8j33/skfrAXVTGssV HBMeJp4CO//wsfbjFN0WKWlW0RmHaLROvp09E= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:cc:subject:organization:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; b=b2NTj0WOvBVlj1dcRqmReDOWMHzTazz5hR3euuiHT4HS7pTVR0KLFlRDT43DUrqrhS C3Cc4KduWjja6YaXar5pOA3dTZ9f9JoFUkpe0yXtkD3txZBfZqPYZLeyc/0TAku5VatQ hvVP5lUjpvH7x7hTreX2NMd85dnjX485OGBWY= Original-Received: by 10.204.76.205 with SMTP id d13mr3968044bkk.93.1286693857755; Sat, 09 Oct 2010 23:57:37 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from localhost ([85.183.18.158]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id a25sm2399496bks.20.2010.10.09.23.57.35 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 09 Oct 2010 23:57:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87sk0ek21m.fsf@lifelogs.com> (Ted Zlatanov's message of "Sun, 10 Oct 2010 01:13:57 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:72845 Archived-At: Ted Zlatanov writes: > On Sun, 10 Oct 2010 03:09:55 +0200 Richard Riley wrote: > > RR> Could (or should) the group parameter spam destination please default to > RR> the groups server? Currently if I set the spam dest as an unqualified > RR> Gnus-Spam for my nnimap server then its going to nnml:Gnus-Spam. I need > RR> to currently fully qualify it to e.g nnimap+riley:Gnus-Spam. > > I think it should behave like a regular group name, which is the > behaviour you're noting. > > Ted I am wondering why this would be better since unqualified is more "local" and is the way for things like spam-split and spam-inbox. If working on a group that belongs to a server it seems logical that merely setting a group destination without fully qualifier such as "nnimap+riles" means on that current group's server on not on some other such as nnml which may, or may not, be random depending on select order.