From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/61549 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Steven E. Harris" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Bad interaction between nnimap + agent + expiry (bug?) Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 11:44:26 -0800 Organization: SEH Labs Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1134592241 1322 80.91.229.2 (14 Dec 2005 20:30:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 20:30:41 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+m10082@lists.math.uh.edu Wed Dec 14 21:30:39 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EmdGl-0006BI-La for ding-account@gmane.org; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 21:30:35 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1EmdGh-0006mF-00; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 14:30:31 -0600 Original-Received: from nas02.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.40]) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1EmcYN-0006hV-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 13:44:43 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by nas02.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1EmcYJ-0003Ux-2i for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 13:44:43 -0600 Original-Received: from adsl-64-171-114-78.dsl.sndg02.pacbell.net ([64.171.114.78] helo=chlorine.gnostech.com) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1EmcY9-0003Zt-00 for ; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 20:44:29 +0100 Original-Received: from sharris by chlorine.gnostech.com with local (Exim 4.54) id IRI6U2-000340-HD; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 11:44:26 -0800 Original-To: Simon Josefsson Mail-Followup-To: Simon Josefsson , ding@gnus.org User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) XEmacs/21.4.13 (cygwin32) X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) Precedence: bulk Original-Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:61549 Archived-At: Simon Josefsson writes: > Yes. The E mark should be visible in the Summary buffer on the > second Gnus if the first Gnus had set the mark. I've noticed messages marked as expirable in one instance not be recognized as expirable in another. (Mark message while at work, go home, connect, and find the same message unmarked.) The server does appear to support client flags: ,---- | 252 SELECT "INBOX" | * FLAGS (gnus-expire gnus-forward gnus-dormant \Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Recent) | * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (gnus-expire gnus-forward gnus-dormant \* \Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen)] Limited | * 148 EXISTS | * 0 RECENT | * OK [UIDVALIDITY 1067275254] Ok | * OK [MYRIGHTS "acdilrsw"] ACL | 252 OK [READ-WRITE] Ok `---- I'll have to try some debugging and see if I can reproduce the problem. -- Steven E. Harris