From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/9060
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Wesley.Hardaker@sphys.unil.ch
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: adaptive word scoring
Date: 02 Dec 1996 10:40:53 +0100
Organization: Universite de Lausanne, BSP
Sender: whardake@iptsun2.unil.ch
Message-ID: <qk24ti55lne.fsf@iptsun2.unil.ch>
References: <199611290525.VAA00464@kim.teleport.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035149142 16238 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:25:42 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:25:42 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <ding-request@ifi.uio.no>
Original-Received: (qmail 25228 invoked from smtpd); 2 Dec 1996 10:18:05 -0000
Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@129.240.64.2)
  by deanna.miranova.com with SMTP; 2 Dec 1996 10:18:03 -0000
Original-Received: from unilmta3.unil.ch (cisun29a.unil.ch [130.223.27.29]) by ifi.uio.no with SMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) 
	id <KAA15689@ifi.uio.no> for <ding@ifi.uio.no> ; Mon, 2 Dec 1996 10:42:38 +0100
Original-Received: from iptsun2.unil.ch by unilmta3.unil.ch with SMTP inbound;
          Mon, 2 Dec 1996 10:42:22 +0100
Original-Received: by iptsun2.unil.ch (5.x/Unil-3.1/) id AA01023;
          Mon, 2 Dec 1996 10:40:55 +0100
Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no
X-Face: #qW^}a%m*T^{A:Cp}$R\"38+d}41-Z}uU8,r%F#c#s:~Nzp0G9](s?,K49KJ]s"*7gvRgA 
        SrAvQc4@/}L7Qc=w{)]ACO\R{LF@S{pXfojjjGg6c;q6{~C}CxC^^&~(F]`1W)%9j/iS/ 
        IM",B1M.?{w8ckLTYD'`|kTr\i\cgY)P4
X-Url: http://www.ece.ucdavis.edu/~hardaker
In-Reply-To: Felix Lee's message of Thu, 28 Nov 1996 21:25:08 -0800
Original-Lines: 27
X-Mailer: Red Gnus v0.72/XEmacs 19.14
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:9060
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:9060


Felix Lee <flee@teleport.com> writes:

> so after using adaptive word scoring for a while, I've
> decided that it's mostly useless.

Yeah, I've found similar results.  The hard thing is that I think it
would be *really* nice to have it work if we could figure out a proper
method of scoring...

Maybe we could turn 'V w' (show word scoring) into a edit buffer where
clicking with the middle button would increase a word score and
shift-middle would lower them.  That way you could go in and muck with
the list on a per group basis.  It would also be nice to add a
'state-toggle' button as well:  active, locked (ie, don't ajust
again), incr-only, decr-only, ignore, etc???  (questionable usage).
That way you could fix the gif problem by simply 'V w', click state
button till it gets to 'ignore', C-c C-c and off you go?  No mucking
with the global word score list.  Heck!  Why not have the word list
show you statistics as well ('gif': -300, #read = 2, #catchup = 105,
etc...)  It should also display an icon when you have mail waiting.
Additionally, it should remember your birthday and sing to you when
the date was right....  uh...  oppps....  Was that outloud?

Of course, this would require a bit more coding (heh heh)...

Wes